Phoenix7957

Phoenix7957 — CS2 Stats

76561198046730438[U:1:86464710]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

538Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,104Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10216 of 24686 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPhoenix7957PREMIER20,104 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning44
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56404Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression3.1
Utility6.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time569ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–1
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26141254%0.02
mirageA2213959%0.02
ancientS1410471%0.01
cacheS129375%0.05
anubisC114736%0.02
infernoD82625%0.01
nukeB63350%0.01
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

312Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8359%1.0316.4
Dust27146%1.0715.7
Ancient4443%1.0414.9
Inferno3262%1.0216.2
Nuke1747%1.1216.4
Anubis1747%1.1715.7
Cache1547%1.3917.3
Overpass838%1.0617.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
562msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
10.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.507% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0118%27 Aug
cache13–50.0023%26 Aug
cache13–80.0618%26 Aug
anubis13–20.1717%25 Aug
anubis7–130.0619%25 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0119%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0227%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0225%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0123%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0116%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0217%22 Aug
inferno14–160.0215%22 Aug
ancient15–150.008%18 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0322%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0115%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0615%15 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0712%15 Aug
dust213–50.0017%12 Aug
ancient13–80.0017%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0526%11 Aug
nuke2–80.0622%11 Aug
dust213–90.0625%10 Aug
dust213–10.1926%9 Aug
cache13–60.1130%8 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0322%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0425%8 Aug
cache16–140.0422%8 Aug
anubis15–150.0416%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0024%3 Aug
dust28–130.0125%2 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0321%2 Aug
mirage13–30.1027%2 Aug
mirage15–150.0018%2 Aug
dust211–130.0721%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0113%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0218%31 Jul
cache13–50.0519%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0126%29 Jul
dust213–20.0118%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0617%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0536%27 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0613%27 Jul
nuke13–20.0238%27 Jul
ancient13–40.0521%26 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0125%25 Jul
inferno6–130.0921%25 Jul
anubis13–30.0531%25 Jul
dust29–130.0126%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0422%24 Jul
dust215–15-0.0417%23 Jul
dust210–130.0329%23 Jul
cache13–50.0823%23 Jul
dust211–130.0324%21 Jul
cache10–130.0320%21 Jul
cache13–110.1222%19 Jul
dust213–00.0335%19 Jul
nuke13–70.0820%18 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0421%18 Jul
ancient13–80.0220%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0419%18 Jul
dust213–110.0521%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0918%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0024%12 Jul
ancient13–60.0721%11 Jul
cache10–130.0611%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0110%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0124%10 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0714%8 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0420%8 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0327%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0121%5 Jul
mirage13–40.0720%5 Jul
dust213–40.0116%5 Jul
inferno13–30.1737%5 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0623%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0020%4 Jul
dust211–130.0028%3 Jul
dust213–30.0216%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0721%1 Jul
cache13–6-0.0116%30 Jun
anubis13–70.0014%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0021%29 Jun
dust213–110.0024%29 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0118%28 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0323%28 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0328%28 Jun
anubis8–130.0116%28 Jun
dust216–130.0112%27 Jun
mirage13–30.1022%27 Jun
ancient16–19-0.0318%27 Jun
mirage13–60.0016%27 Jun
dust27–130.0522%26 Jun
dust213–30.0931%26 Jun
cache13–70.0713%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0923%19 Jun
dust213–50.0519%19 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0223%15 Jun
ancient13–10.0119%14 Jun
dust28–130.0624%14 Jun
dust211–130.0329%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →