mkz

mkz — CS2 Stats

76561198046000689[U:1:85734961]Steam profile ↗

1,035Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,359Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8169 of 29851 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,270 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmkzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,270 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,359 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning50
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression3.8
Utility5.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.0
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time577ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%0.01
infernoS2013765%0.04
ancientS1712571%0.04
mirageD1641225%0.02
anubisS75271%0.03
cache42250%0.01
nuke31233%0.01
overpass21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,399Matches
51%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
87.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8753%1.2317.4
Inferno8551%1.2517.5
Anubis5250%1.2017.9
Mirage3135%1.1818.0
Nuke2450%1.1416.4
Overpass944%1.1720.0
Dust2875%1.7118.0
Train540%1.5317.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
588msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.19HE damage / grenade
5.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–11-0.0444%16 Aug
inferno13–60.1941%9 Aug
dust213–50.0631%8 Aug
dust23–13-0.0864%1 Aug
nuke13–10.0647%1 Aug
anubis13–00.0339%19 Jul
mirage7–130.1127%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0130%18 Jul
dust26–13-0.0320%18 Jul
mirage0–7-0.070%18 Jul
inferno5–130.0333%18 Jul
dust25–130.0414%18 Jul
dust27–10-0.0515%17 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0233%16 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0029%16 Jul
dust210–130.0131%16 Jul
ancient13–110.0623%16 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0439%16 Jul
inferno13–110.1043%16 Jul
dust213–80.0426%14 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1517%14 Jul
ancient13–40.0833%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0819%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0622%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0217%14 Jul
dust213–9-0.0040%13 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0019%13 Jul
dust213–160.0517%13 Jul
inferno13–30.0429%12 Jul
mirage13–30.2328%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0527%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0424%12 Jul
inferno13–60.0224%12 Jul
dust213–110.0441%12 Jul
dust213–30.0225%11 Jul
dust213–40.0830%11 Jul
anubis13–100.0126%11 Jul
cache13–110.0639%11 Jul
anubis10–130.0021%11 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0420%10 Jul
dust213–50.1529%10 Jul
cache13–110.0235%10 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0714%10 Jul
mirage9–130.0314%4 Jul
inferno16–120.0635%4 Jul
dust213–100.0329%4 Jul
inferno10–20.0140%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0529%3 Jul
inferno9–130.0637%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0631%2 Jul
inferno13–60.0731%2 Jul
anubis13–50.0226%2 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0124%2 Jul
cache2–13-0.0257%2 Jul
mirage15–150.0318%2 Jul
dust213–90.0335%2 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0520%2 Jul
ancient13–40.1234%1 Jul
dust213–160.0224%1 Jul
dust29–130.0228%30 Jun
dust215–15-0.0024%30 Jun
ancient13–60.1328%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.088%30 Jun
nuke5–7-0.0313%30 Jun
anubis13–50.0522%30 Jun
inferno13–60.0244%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.0026%30 Jun
ancient13–30.0821%30 Jun
mirage4–130.0533%30 Jun
overpass13–40.0112%30 Jun
inferno14–160.0535%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0017%26 Jun
dust216–120.0429%26 Jun
inferno6–11-0.0432%26 Jun
mirage13–20.0432%26 Jun
ancient13–60.0552%26 Jun
anubis11–130.0323%26 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0420%25 Jun
dust213–100.0323%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0316%25 Jun
dust26–13-0.0122%25 Jun
inferno13–80.1631%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0729%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0331%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0235%21 Jun
ancient13–50.0324%21 Jun
dust216–12-0.0211%21 Jun
inferno8–130.0524%21 Jun
mirage13–90.0829%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0318%21 Jun
dust213–70.0233%21 Jun
ancient11–130.0133%21 Jun
overpass7–130.0122%21 Jun
dust213–70.0424%20 Jun
anubis13–50.0631%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0724%20 Jun
ancient13–50.0532%20 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0035%19 Jun
ancient13–100.0134%14 Jun
dust213–70.1651%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →