elaren — CS2 Stats

76561198045187386[U:1:84921658]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,750Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,741Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7752 of 13851 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,501 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning49

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–52–4Last 10044%Win rateWLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression9.1

Utility6.3

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.9

Utility6.3

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time616ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — inferno 9–3

13–0Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

12–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21dust2Weakest map · 14% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	S	21	14–7	67%	0.00
mirage	D	17	4–13	24%	0.01
anubis	B	15	7–8	47%	0.03
dust2	D	14	2–12	14%	-0.01
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.05
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
cache	B	6	3–3	50%	0.03
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

567Matches

51%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

88.3ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	91	56%	1.27	17.6
Inferno	78	50%	1.35	18.2
Mirage	74	49%	1.14	17.6
Nuke	65	52%	1.22	18.0
Anubis	54	50%	1.31	17.8
Dust2	36	42%	1.20	15.3
Overpass	30	60%	1.14	16.1
Cache	18	44%	1.41	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy

32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

80.5%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

613msReaction time

31.2%T opening success

57.7%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

6.8%Flash assists

9.84HE damage / grenade

9.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.2319% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	-0.02	25%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	38%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	16%	21 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.01	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.11	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	18%	6 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.06	30%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	13%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	11%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	21%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	12%	3 Aug →
cache	13–0	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	11%	28 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	41%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	29%	28 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.00	14%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	9%	10 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.00	27%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.06	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	22%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.17	13%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.12	20%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.09	16%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.10	16%	17 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	16%	14 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	20%	14 Jun →
nuke	19–22	0.03	16%	13 Jun →
mirage	17–19	0.01	20%	13 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.07	19%	12 Jun →
inferno	9–7	0.07	23%	12 Jun →
inferno	7–9	0.12	38%	12 Jun →
overpass	8–8	0.11	14%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.01	19%	9 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.07	16%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.08	21%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.03	24%	7 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.03	17%	5 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.13	20%	5 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	7%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	8%	30 May →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	24%	30 May →
mirage	5–13	0.01	27%	23 May →
cache	13–6	0.03	18%	22 May →
anubis	11–13	0.01	13%	20 May →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	21%	16 May →
nuke	13–10	0.02	13%	15 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	15%	15 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	35%	13 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	29%	10 May →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	13%	10 May →
cache	10–13	0.07	12%	9 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	17%	9 May →
inferno	9–3	0.24	21%	9 May →
nuke	9–1	-0.00	17%	9 May →
cache	13–2	0.13	13%	3 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	23%	2 May →
mirage	7–13	0.09	26%	26 Apr →
anubis	8–13	0.05	10%	26 Apr →
overpass	13–11	-0.05	10%	26 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.10	13%	25 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	15%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.03	28%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.07	23%	25 Apr →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	13%	22 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.03	8%	22 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.00	21%	22 Apr →
anubis	13–1	0.02	20%	15 Apr →
anubis	11–13	0.00	5%	15 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.10	32%	14 Apr →
dust2	15–15	0.09	24%	14 Apr →
anubis	11–13	0.07	12%	10 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.00	11%	10 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.05	28%	10 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	22%	8 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.00	17%	8 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	21%	5 Apr →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	16%	5 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	16%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.03	24%	5 Apr →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	7%	4 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.06	14%	4 Apr →
ancient	15–15	0.11	22%	4 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.05	20%	4 Apr →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	11%	3 Apr →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	11%	3 Apr →
inferno	14–16	0.03	14%	3 Apr →
ancient	16–12	0.08	16%	3 Apr →
dust2	5–13	0.04	26%	3 Apr →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	21%	2 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.01	19%	1 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	15%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	16%	31 Mar →