TheEskimoBro — CS2 Stats

76561198045144172[U:1:84878444]

5,200Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,403Purple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11099 of 24029 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTheEskimoBroFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,403 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning37
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45469Last 10045%Win rateWTLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression2.3
Utility6.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time565ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — debris 9–4
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 32dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA32181456%-0.00
anubisC1981142%0.01
cacheC1771041%-0.00
ancientC167944%-0.01
dust2D71614%-0.04
mirage42250%-0.06
eldorado3030%-0.11
debris110100%0.22
nuke110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

575Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.6ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11754%1.0415.4
Anubis9250%0.9314.0
Ancient8759%0.8913.0
Mirage7541%0.9713.0
Dust26954%0.9613.1
Vertigo4347%1.1916.7
Nuke4151%1.0315.7
Train956%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.82HE damage / grenade
8.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3543% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.6514% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0413%28 Aug
anubis12–120.0122%28 Aug
inferno8–13-0.048%28 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0725%27 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0212%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.039%26 Aug
inferno9–130.0113%25 Aug
inferno13–90.0318%25 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0316%23 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1117%23 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0615%22 Aug
inferno12–120.0621%22 Aug
inferno13–60.0112%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0313%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.019%20 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0215%20 Aug
dust213–16-0.057%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0715%19 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0711%19 Aug
anubis13–90.0016%19 Aug
cache6–13-0.0019%18 Aug
inferno11–130.008%18 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0117%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0114%17 Aug
cache13–90.1017%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0418%16 Aug
inferno13–50.018%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.026%16 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1013%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.054%15 Aug
inferno8–130.076%13 Aug
inferno13–70.0127%9 Aug
anubis13–10.0914%9 Aug
inferno13–70.076%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.079%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.064%8 Aug
ancient6–00.0927%8 Aug
cache13–100.0213%8 Aug
inferno1–7-0.090%8 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0315%4 Aug
anubis6–130.0214%4 Aug
anubis8–130.0518%2 Aug
ancient10–13-0.019%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0017%2 Aug
cache5–13-0.0318%2 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0413%2 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0111%2 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0319%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.077%1 Aug
cache13–30.0813%1 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0115%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0314%29 Jul
ancient13–5-0.048%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0612%29 Jul
anubis13–80.0410%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.055%28 Jul
ancient8–13-0.024%28 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0110%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.048%27 Jul
cache13–30.016%27 Jul
eldorado6–9-0.1115%27 Jul
inferno3–130.0324%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0215%26 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0513%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0114%25 Jul
ancient10–130.0418%25 Jul
anubis15–150.0318%24 Jul
anubis13–80.027%24 Jul
cache13–90.0310%24 Jul
debris9–40.2215%23 Jul
eldorado3–9-0.1029%23 Jul
cache8–130.045%22 Jul
cache6–13-0.0525%22 Jul
inferno13–40.0414%21 Jul
anubis13–90.0012%21 Jul
ancient16–120.0214%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0212%21 Jul
inferno13–100.0015%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0213%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0212%20 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0325%19 Jul
cache9–130.008%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0213%19 Jul
cache13–10-0.0215%19 Jul
ancient13–40.086%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0512%18 Jul
inferno7–130.0013%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0216%18 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0116%17 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0215%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.048%16 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0016%16 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0618%16 Jul
anubis13–40.0916%15 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0217%14 Jul
eldorado1–9-0.1211%14 Jul
anubis4–130.0120%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0017%13 Jul
inferno13–60.058%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →