ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ

ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ — CS2 Stats

JP76561198044916057[U:1:84650329]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,224Tracked matches33%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.1 Learning
Premier CS Rating10,869Blue band · top ~50.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13010 of 17977 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGʕ•ᴥ•ʔFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,869 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning38
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.3
Aggression0.0
Utility5.5
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning3.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time583ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy10.3%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 10.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 6–13
132Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 35% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31112035%-0.01
ancientC1881044%-0.01
nukeS1510567%0.00
mirageC146843%0.00
infernoB136746%-0.03
anubisA53260%0.01
cache41325%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

81Matches
51%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
65.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2025%0.7612.4
Nuke1765%0.9413.4
Ancient1547%0.7412.7
Dust21464%0.8211.9
Inferno1457%0.8512.1
Anubis1100%0.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.5%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
67.5%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
586msReaction time
4.6%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5357° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.4792% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.028%28 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0511%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0411%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0016%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.018%27 Aug
dust213–50.0113%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.068%27 Aug
nuke13–10-0.056%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.059%24 Aug
dust213–5-0.0611%24 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0310%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0710%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.058%23 Aug
dust29–130.0313%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0412%22 Aug
nuke13–20.0110%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0014%22 Aug
dust26–130.0212%22 Aug
inferno13–30.0314%22 Aug
nuke13–16-0.076%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.018%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0111%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0312%21 Aug
dust213–11-0.0511%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.079%21 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0212%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.057%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.059%20 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0215%16 Aug
anubis13–70.0814%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0611%16 Aug
mirage7–4-0.027%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.054%14 Aug
mirage13–7-0.038%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.080%14 Aug
mirage8–130.0318%11 Aug
nuke13–90.0823%11 Aug
dust213–70.0817%11 Aug
anubis13–100.0017%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0310%1 Aug
inferno13–40.1022%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0122%1 Aug
dust213–60.0624%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0616%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0617%1 Aug
anubis13–10-0.047%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.0012%1 Aug
ancient13–60.039%1 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0217%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0717%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0215%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0413%26 Jul
cache3–13-0.0217%26 Jul
nuke13–100.036%26 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0012%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0215%26 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0415%26 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0216%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.107%26 Jul
ancient13–70.0517%25 Jul
dust213–70.0819%25 Jul
ancient14–16-0.038%24 Jul
dust213–90.0121%24 Jul
dust216–12-0.029%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0918%24 Jul
ancient13–80.038%23 Jul
dust213–16-0.0115%23 Jul
mirage6–130.1635%21 Jul
dust213–60.0216%20 Jul
dust213–160.0823%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.076%20 Jul
nuke13–110.0514%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0214%19 Jul
nuke13–20.0515%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0812%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0117%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.067%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0611%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0323%18 Jul
cache13–3-0.0114%18 Jul
nuke2–13-0.108%18 Jul
nuke11–130.007%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0412%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.019%18 Jul
ancient7–130.0319%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.0115%17 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0810%17 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0421%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0414%17 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0917%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.0214%16 Jul
nuke13–160.0115%16 Jul
ancient8–130.055%16 Jul
dust215–150.1023%16 Jul
anubis6–130.0412%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0423%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.087%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0513%16 Jul
ancient13–50.019%16 Jul
cache9–130.0515%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →