Kolejarz1910 — CS2 Stats

76561198044868749[U:1:84603021]✓ No bans

1,803Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,320 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKolejarz1910FACEITLevel 7 · 1,320 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning41
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateWLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression4.7
Utility5.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time572ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA47281960%0.01
dust2S1812667%-0.00
ancientB178947%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.00
anubisD51420%-0.04
cache220100%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,339Matches
48%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage54553%1.1316.3
Ancient25843%1.0516.4
Dust216646%1.0215.6
Nuke12551%1.0515.9
Anubis12047%0.9414.6
Inferno4840%0.8614.2
Overpass2857%1.0816.3
Train1315%0.7011.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
563msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.23HE damage / grenade
9.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2595% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0127%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0116%27 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0226%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0419%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0315%25 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0619%25 Aug
mirage13–90.0129%25 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0220%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0428%25 Aug
dust219–17-0.0622%25 Aug
cache13–70.0027%25 Aug
mirage16–130.0125%23 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0211%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0321%23 Aug
dust216–130.0629%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0820%22 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0136%20 Aug
dust216–130.0118%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0427%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0732%17 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0326%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0330%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0223%17 Aug
dust213–10.0429%17 Aug
dust213–7-0.0217%16 Aug
mirage13–70.1420%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0216%16 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0220%16 Aug
nuke11–130.0238%15 Aug
dust213–110.0435%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0524%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0122%10 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0111%10 Aug
dust216–190.0320%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0331%3 Aug
nuke8–130.0020%29 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0727%29 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0327%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0612%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0814%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0219%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0228%22 Jul
dust213–40.0111%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0727%21 Jul
nuke8–130.0033%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0415%21 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0229%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0729%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0218%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0212%20 Jul
ancient16–130.0117%20 Jul
mirage4–130.0017%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0215%19 Jul
dust213–4-0.1157%19 Jul
nuke16–130.0137%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0220%15 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0113%15 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0315%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0330%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0022%14 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0314%13 Jul
ancient22–18-0.0320%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0222%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0614%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0429%12 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0410%12 Jul
dust213–160.0131%10 Jul
ancient13–60.009%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0219%8 Jul
dust213–11-0.0621%8 Jul
ancient16–120.0224%7 Jul
cache13–50.0220%6 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0217%6 Jul
dust213–80.0126%6 Jul
mirage13–20.0322%3 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0026%30 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0435%29 Jun
ancient13–80.0618%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.055%29 Jun
mirage7–130.0115%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0312%28 Jun
dust213–100.0722%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0528%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0319%28 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0325%28 Jun
mirage16–120.0217%28 Jun
mirage13–50.0420%27 Jun
mirage13–80.0727%27 Jun
mirage13–60.0816%27 Jun
ancient7–130.0315%27 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0713%27 Jun
dust24–13-0.0622%27 Jun
mirage9–130.0410%27 Jun
dust213–11-0.0028%27 Jun
ancient9–130.0215%27 Jun
mirage13–80.0915%27 Jun
mirage13–90.0541%27 Jun
dust210–130.0014%26 Jun
dust29–13-0.0113%25 Jun
mirage11–130.0219%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →