Diffie Helmann

Diffie Helmann — CS2 Stats

76561198044611578[U:1:84345850]Steam profile ↗

1,165Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,437Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7904 of 52704 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDiffie HelmannPREMIER24,437 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning53
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45532Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.3
Utility5.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time551ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — sanctum 9–0
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB21101148%0.01
nukeS1813572%0.01
anubisD1441029%0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.00
mirageD124833%0.00
cacheB105550%0.03
infernoB105550%-0.01
sanctum110100%0.26
vertigo1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

482Matches
54%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
81.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5250%1.2216.3
Ancient4753%1.3618.7
Anubis4252%1.4216.6
Inferno3959%1.4217.7
Nuke2564%1.4518.0
Dust22467%1.2518.3
Vertigo1669%1.3317.7
Cache633%1.6819.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
555msReaction time
22.6%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
12.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5506% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0322%30 Aug
cache6–130.0619%30 Aug
cache11–130.0712%29 Aug
ancient9–130.0117%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0722%29 Aug
dust213–60.0622%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0331%15 Aug
nuke13–80.0726%15 Aug
cache13–20.1423%15 Aug
cache12–160.0012%2 Aug
dust213–80.0518%24 Jul
cache13–10-0.0113%24 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0216%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0317%24 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0510%18 Jul
mirage13–30.0124%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0213%18 Jul
cache3–13-0.0524%17 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0222%17 Jul
inferno1–13-0.086%17 Jul
anubis11–130.0517%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0842%12 Jul
ancient13–6-0.068%12 Jul
nuke13–50.0724%12 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0913%12 Jul
nuke11–2-0.0213%12 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0322%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0220%12 Jul
cache13–100.0523%12 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0022%11 Jul
dust23–13-0.0522%11 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0215%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0715%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0831%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.053%11 Jul
inferno13–20.0623%11 Jul
ancient13–90.024%11 Jul
anubis13–100.0118%10 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0117%3 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0225%2 Jun
mirage13–100.0113%24 May
nuke15–150.019%15 May
mirage13–160.0123%15 May
ancient10–13-0.0413%8 May
ancient11–130.0133%8 May
nuke9–130.0414%3 May
nuke13–9-0.0114%3 May
cache13–10-0.0012%1 May
anubis10–130.0619%1 May
nuke13–100.0524%1 May
cache13–100.1320%1 May
dust214–160.0227%29 Apr
anubis13–110.0727%26 Apr
ancient13–80.0216%25 Apr
ancient11–130.0312%25 Apr
anubis15–150.0024%25 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0414%25 Apr
ancient13–90.0825%13 Apr
dust27–13-0.0731%12 Apr
ancient13–40.1018%11 Apr
ancient13–90.0918%11 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0218%11 Apr
dust25–130.0024%11 Apr
anubis13–80.1024%10 Apr
mirage6–130.0217%10 Apr
nuke13–60.0820%10 Apr
inferno8–130.0221%10 Apr
sanctum9–00.2628%10 Apr
nuke16–140.0126%9 Apr
dust28–13-0.0114%3 Apr
ancient13–6-0.066%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.1015%28 Mar
mirage8–130.0321%21 Mar
dust213–30.1120%21 Mar
mirage10–130.0812%14 Mar
inferno13–80.1110%14 Mar
dust211–13-0.0219%8 Mar
ancient8–130.0215%7 Mar
dust23–13-0.0634%7 Mar
dust27–130.0017%7 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0117%7 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0410%7 Mar
nuke13–60.0024%6 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0328%6 Mar
anubis6–13-0.078%28 Feb
mirage13–20.0716%28 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0517%21 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0315%20 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0313%20 Feb
ancient13–100.0428%20 Feb
nuke13–70.0427%15 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0023%15 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0233%14 Feb
nuke13–9-0.022%14 Feb
nuke7–13-0.049%14 Feb
anubis8–130.0520%14 Feb
mirage8–130.0312%14 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0316%13 Feb
vertigo10–130.0630%13 Feb
anubis10–130.0426%8 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →