6NOME — CS2 Stats

US76561198043814713[U:1:83548985]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

818Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning61

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–43–13Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6

Aggression8.0

Utility2.9

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.9

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning6.1

Utility2.9

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time541ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%+5.0%

first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — office 13–1

13–1Biggest win — office

6Longest win streak

5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 52% over 29cacheWeakest map · 37% over 46

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	46	17–29	37%	0.01
office	B	29	15–14	52%	0.03
ancient	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01
fachwerk	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
mirage	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.06
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
italy	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
dust2	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches

51%Win rate

1.36Avg K/D

—ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	40	60%	1.40	18.6
Mirage	35	43%	1.33	17.8
Vertigo	31	42%	1.54	18.0
Inferno	20	35%	1.18	16.6
Nuke	17	59%	1.49	19.4
Ancient	15	60%	1.70	19.1
Overpass	9	56%	1.28	17.3
Dust2	1	100%	0.94	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

80.5%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

540msReaction time

31.9%T opening success

51.5%CT opening success

0.24Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

9.43HE damage / grenade

2.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2411 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.8668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	3–13	-0.03	17%	29 Aug →
office	13–9	-0.04	8%	24 Aug →
train	13–4	0.12	8%	15 Aug →
office	8–13	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	17%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	23%	9 Aug →
office	13–1	0.16	24%	9 Aug →
office	4–13	-0.03	30%	8 Aug →
office	11–13	0.04	11%	18 Jul →
fachwerk	13–4	0.03	19%	18 Jul →
shelter	8–13	0.02	7%	16 Jul →
office	9–13	-0.04	16%	16 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.04	26%	16 Jul →
boulder	13–5	0.06	34%	11 Jul →
shelter	13–6	-0.02	29%	11 Jul →
fachwerk	13–10	0.05	12%	11 Jul →
boulder	10–13	0.01	17%	11 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.09	25%	5 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	14%	4 Jul →
office	13–7	0.05	11%	4 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	33%	3 Jul →
office	6–13	0.05	18%	3 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	18%	26 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.05	14%	22 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.02	16%	20 Jun →
office	13–5	0.04	20%	20 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.02	22%	19 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.01	22%	19 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.00	21%	13 Jun →
office	12–6	-0.02	17%	13 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.02	41%	8 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.03	24%	8 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.00	33%	8 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.09	21%	7 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.04	21%	31 May →
office	6–13	-0.01	13%	31 May →
cache	12–12	0.01	11%	31 May →
office	13–7	0.09	15%	30 May →
cache	13–10	0.12	12%	30 May →
office	13–11	0.04	12%	25 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	15%	25 May →
office	13–6	0.03	12%	23 May →
cache	10–13	0.01	8%	23 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	18 May →
italy	13–7	0.13	13%	18 May →
office	13–10	-0.02	28%	16 May →
cache	8–13	0.00	18%	16 May →
office	4–13	0.02	15%	16 May →
cache	3–13	-0.08	24%	14 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	10%	14 May →
cache	13–8	0.06	12%	11 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	12%	10 May →
cache	5–8	0.01	17%	10 May →
cache	9–13	-0.03	10%	9 May →
cache	13–9	-0.03	13%	9 May →
cache	13–3	0.11	17%	9 May →
cache	6–13	-0.04	17%	8 May →
cache	13–3	0.03	14%	8 May →
cache	11–13	0.05	17%	8 May →
cache	6–13	0.04	16%	7 May →
cache	8–13	-0.06	17%	4 May →
cache	13–10	-0.00	21%	3 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	20%	3 May →
cache	13–7	-0.03	8%	3 May →
cache	6–13	-0.05	5%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.07	38%	2 May →
cache	12–12	-0.07	17%	2 May →
cache	13–8	-0.04	10%	1 May →
cache	10–13	0.04	14%	1 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	18%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.02	17%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	-0.05	3%	29 Apr →
office	8–13	0.02	17%	25 Apr →
office	12–12	0.10	16%	25 Apr →
office	9–13	0.08	11%	24 Apr →
train	8–13	-0.01	4%	23 Apr →
office	13–6	0.07	6%	22 Apr →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	27%	11 Apr →
office	4–13	0.01	15%	11 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	6%	4 Apr →
office	13–8	0.06	27%	4 Apr →
office	13–7	0.09	25%	4 Apr →
inferno	12–12	-0.03	10%	26 Mar →
office	13–7	-0.01	25%	22 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	16%	15 Mar →
office	13–11	0.09	12%	15 Mar →
office	13–8	0.11	9%	13 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.00	6%	13 Mar →
stronghold	13–8	0.02	8%	13 Mar →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	16%	9 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.03	20%	9 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	11%	7 Mar →
office	10–13	-0.03	9%	7 Mar →
office	10–13	0.04	13%	6 Mar →
italy	13–7	0.01	12%	6 Mar →
overpass	8–13	-0.02	6%	5 Mar →
office	5–13	-0.02	13%	5 Mar →
ancient	12–12	0.02	18%	5 Mar →