swagers — CS2 Stats

76561198043586598[U:1:83320870]

2,409Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,705Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3461 of 20788 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,163 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGswagersFACEITLevel 9 · 2,163 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,705 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning42
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateWWLLTWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.0
Utility5.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time588ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — debris 8–8
131Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA169756%0.01
ancientC156940%-0.01
cacheA148657%-0.00
infernoA138562%-0.00
dust2D124833%-0.03
mirageA95456%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.02
debris41325%0.04
poseidon3030%0.02
overpass32167%-0.00
eldorado2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

673Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
71.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno12457%0.9914.5
Ancient10456%0.9913.9
Mirage10253%0.9213.9
Anubis9251%1.0715.7
Nuke8852%0.9814.2
Dust28445%0.9013.3
Overpass2945%0.8013.6
Train2552%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
598msReaction time
18.7%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.47HE damage / grenade
9.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.6983% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0224%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0123%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0216%17 Aug
poseidon3–9-0.0218%17 Aug
poseidon8–80.0623%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0229%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.055%8 Aug
inferno7–130.0122%8 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0212%8 Aug
mirage13–70.0417%6 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0417%6 Aug
cache9–130.0024%5 Aug
dust213–160.0112%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0119%29 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0419%27 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0213%26 Jul
debris7–9-0.0516%26 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0226%25 Jul
cache13–40.0315%25 Jul
dust22–6-0.060%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0221%22 Jul
cache12–16-0.0313%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0413%21 Jul
debris6–9-0.063%18 Jul
eldorado3–9-0.0320%18 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0518%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0211%18 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%18 Jul
cache13–9-0.0514%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0815%18 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0221%16 Jul
debris9–40.0718%15 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.0111%15 Jul
debris8–80.1818%15 Jul
cache13–80.0415%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0421%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0622%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0521%12 Jul
cache13–16-0.049%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0412%10 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0011%10 Jul
cache3–13-0.0524%10 Jul
dust213–40.0229%9 Jul
cache13–70.047%9 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%9 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0715%9 Jul
dust216–140.0118%9 Jul
nuke13–70.0123%9 Jul
inferno9–4-0.0724%4 Jul
poseidon3–90.0226%4 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0517%4 Jul
ancient0–130.0513%4 Jul
dust213–8-0.0419%4 Jul
nuke13–90.0416%4 Jul
anubis13–50.0221%3 Jul
nuke4–130.0315%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0223%3 Jul
nuke16–140.0614%1 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0215%1 Jul
dust26–13-0.0318%1 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0512%27 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0223%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0114%27 Jun
inferno8–80.0716%27 Jun
nuke4–130.0115%26 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0114%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0418%26 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0213%26 Jun
nuke13–50.0212%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0714%26 Jun
nuke13–10.0527%24 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0935%24 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0613%14 Jun
nuke13–50.0326%14 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0411%14 Jun
dust213–100.0017%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0026%5 Jun
nuke3–9-0.0915%5 Jun
mirage4–13-0.067%3 Jun
cache13–8-0.025%3 Jun
dust213–16-0.0621%22 May
inferno13–5-0.0213%20 May
nuke9–130.0118%20 May
ancient5–13-0.0518%18 May
overpass13–70.0018%18 May
ancient13–50.0119%18 May
inferno13–80.0612%17 May
anubis13–10-0.0418%17 May
nuke13–110.0215%17 May
anubis16–140.0115%16 May
nuke13–20.0211%16 May
inferno13–20.0724%16 May
ancient1–13-0.043%16 May
nuke7–13-0.0211%16 May
nuke13–8-0.0319%16 May
overpass13–40.0217%16 May
cache5–130.0519%16 May
mirage6–13-0.0215%15 May
nuke12–16-0.028%15 May
ancient15–15-0.039%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →