mentally touchable — CS2 Stats

76561198042361078[U:1:82095350]✓ No bans

979Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,541Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,101 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning75

Utility85

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4

Aggression9.9

Utility8.5

Positioning7.5

Opening Duels4.9

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 85 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning7.5

Utility8.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time503ms−103ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%−3.0%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–2

13–0Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 74% over 19dust2Weakest map · 39% over 41

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	41	16–25	39%	0.01
ancient	B	20	9–11	45%	0.04
cache	S	19	14–5	74%	0.02
inferno	B	16	8–8	50%	0.02
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	0.05
mirage	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 41). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

149Matches

58%Win rate

1.50Avg K/D

95.9ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	40	62%	1.68	20.1
Inferno	26	73%	1.50	19.9
Ancient	22	41%	1.57	19.7
Overpass	12	67%	1.54	22.0
Train	2	50%	1.32	16.5
Mirage	1	100%	1.79	25.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy

35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.0%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

6.5°Preaim

500msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

61.3%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

17.11HE damage / grenade

24.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.718% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 41 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.02	11%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	21%	27 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	11%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	7%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	23%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.07	20%	25 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.03	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.14	9%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	9%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.02	27%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	8%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	8–1	0.16	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.00	10%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	6%	14 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	20%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	15%	12 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	12%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	9%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	20%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.00	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.06	30%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	25%	4 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.04	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	36%	31 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	20%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.02	20%	31 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	27%	30 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.10	24%	29 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.08	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	4–0	0.09	36%	28 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	10%	28 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.05	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.02	13%	25 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.05	15%	24 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	22%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	12%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	25%	21 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.12	15%	20 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	13%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	21%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	20%	16 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	28%	13 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.08	21%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.09	19%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	21%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.00	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	30%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	13%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	19%	9 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	17%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	13%	9 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.08	16%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	24%	7 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	16%	6 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	14%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.17	19%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	18%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	17%	3 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	21%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	15%	1 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.08	11%	1 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	22%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.07	25%	1 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	22%	1 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	18%	1 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	16%	25 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.01	17%	25 Jun →