[UDT]happyjuhl — CS2 Stats

76561198041567362[U:1:81301634]

517Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,798Blue band · top ~50.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23716 of 33177 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[UDT]happyjuhlPREMIER10,798 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45514Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression3.7
Utility4.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time634ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC29121741%0.00
nukeB168850%-0.00
ancientB137654%-0.00
anubisC125742%0.03
dust2A127558%0.01
cacheD93633%-0.01
mirageD71614%0.00
overpass220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
603msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
5.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1101% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0416%29 Aug
anubis8–130.0616%29 Aug
nuke14–16-0.049%29 Aug
dust29–130.0230%29 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0110%27 Aug
dust213–80.0624%27 Aug
nuke0–3-0.01100%27 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0018%27 Aug
dust213–40.0023%27 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0011%27 Aug
cache8–130.059%27 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0520%27 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0213%21 Aug
cache13–3-0.0212%21 Aug
inferno13–50.0318%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0114%21 Aug
cache13–70.0518%21 Aug
dust213–6-0.0012%21 Aug
dust212–16-0.0420%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0122%10 Aug
nuke5–130.0316%10 Aug
inferno4–130.0420%10 Aug
cache6–13-0.0712%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.029%10 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0217%10 Aug
dust213–30.0050%9 Aug
dust210–130.0824%8 Aug
nuke13–40.109%8 Aug
mirage15–150.0211%8 Aug
ancient5–130.0031%8 Aug
dust213–110.0018%8 Aug
cache9–130.0519%8 Aug
dust211–130.0718%7 Aug
ancient13–7-0.016%7 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0011%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0419%7 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0815%7 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0211%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0926%3 Aug
anubis13–80.0519%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0311%3 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0315%3 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0112%1 Aug
ancient6–13-0.028%1 Aug
ancient4–13-0.067%1 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0116%1 Aug
ancient13–0-0.0314%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0019%1 Aug
ancient13–100.0415%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0018%27 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0617%27 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0014%27 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0417%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0714%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0615%23 Jul
inferno15–150.0516%23 Jul
dust216–14-0.0014%23 Jul
cache13–6-0.0414%23 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0217%22 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%22 Jul
cache14–16-0.0713%22 Jul
nuke13–9-0.069%22 Jul
inferno13–50.0814%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.046%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0217%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0017%20 Jul
inferno13–20.035%20 Jul
cache11–130.0418%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0214%17 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0523%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0015%17 Jul
inferno13–30.0624%17 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0115%13 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0113%13 Jul
ancient13–70.109%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0520%13 Jul
anubis11–130.0619%12 Jul
mirage13–16-0.009%12 Jul
dust213–60.0220%12 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0113%12 Jul
inferno13–50.0825%12 Jul
ancient5–130.0110%12 Jul
overpass16–13-0.0019%6 Jul
inferno13–70.0016%6 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0026%6 Jul
inferno13–30.0719%6 Jul
mirage5–13-0.068%3 Jul
overpass13–80.0211%3 Jul
anubis8–130.0117%3 Jul
anubis13–70.0611%3 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0812%3 Jul
inferno12–160.0120%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0620%3 Jul
nuke13–160.0025%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0414%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0121%2 Jul
anubis13–40.1613%2 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0110%2 Jul
inferno9–13-0.067%30 Jun
anubis13–90.0216%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →