[BRE] Alaire "Le Young" — CS2 Stats

76561198041555554[U:1:81289826]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,452Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,717Purple band · top ~21.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10408 of 17645 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning41

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2

Aggression3.9

Utility6.1

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.88 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning4.1

Utility6.1

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time606ms+7ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 13–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

9Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	31	13–18	42%	0.00
mirage	B	29	14–15	48%	0.01
cache	S	9	7–2	78%	0.01
inferno	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.02
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.04
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
office	—	2	2–0	100%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

57%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

99.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	25%	1.05	22.3
Vertigo	3	67%	0.77	14.0
Overpass	2	50%	1.14	16.5
Nuke	2	50%	0.86	13.0
Anubis	2	50%	0.58	9.5
Ancient	1	0%	0.59	10.0
Dust2	1	100%	1.22	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy

39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.3%Spray accuracy

86.4%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

613msReaction time

19.3%T opening success

54.1%CT opening success

0.88Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

13.15HE damage / grenade

5.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.3181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	12–16	-0.01	21%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	16%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.07	6%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	14%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.02	19%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	30%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	8%	3 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.12	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	47%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	24%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	10%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	38%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	14%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.07	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	18%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	10%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	11%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	15%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.09	27%	31 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.02	8%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.09	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	10%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	14%	30 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	17%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	20%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	12%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	8%	23 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	23%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.09	13%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.20	19%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.02	19%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.12	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.06	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	28%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.11	23%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.13	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	10%	18 Jul →
office	13–6	0.06	14%	18 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	19%	14 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	34%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	14%	14 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.06	18%	13 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	18%	13 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.00	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	16%	10 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.03	10%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	19%	3 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.08	29%	1 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	19%	1 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	11%	1 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	28%	30 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	29%	30 Jun →
office	13–4	0.16	33%	30 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.01	13%	30 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	18%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	29 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.01	17%	29 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	8%	28 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	28%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.12	22%	27 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	17%	27 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	16%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	17%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.04	22%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.11	33%	26 Jun →
overpass	16–13	0.02	22%	26 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.03	18%	26 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.00	13%	26 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.06	11%	26 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	17%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.03	25%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	10%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	17%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.02	16%	25 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.04	19%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.06	14%	25 Jun →