Grawrd — CS2 Stats

76561198040703545[U:1:80437817]✓ No bans

452Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,775Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1882 of 6553 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrawrdFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,775 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning44
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.3
Utility6.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch2.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time611ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS30201067%0.01
dust2C2181338%-0.02
ancientA159660%0.00
anubisS128467%0.02
nukeD71614%-0.01
infernoB63350%0.00
overpassS65183%0.04
cache31233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
59%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
87.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage862%1.4316.3
Inferno475%0.9815.0
Ancient333%0.9416.7
Dust2250%1.4619.0
Anubis250%1.3721.5
Overpass2100%1.4019.5
Nuke20%1.2518.0
Cache2100%1.6916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
613msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
13.1%Flash assists
6.28HE damage / grenade
13.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.0785% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0124%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0512%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.066%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0324%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0718%7 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0018%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0913%7 Aug
mirage13–10.0014%7 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0317%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0018%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0218%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0317%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0524%18 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0220%18 Jul
cache2–13-0.0610%17 Jul
mirage13–70.1014%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0522%17 Jul
ancient13–90.0216%16 Jul
dust213–40.0316%16 Jul
dust215–150.0723%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0517%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0126%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0916%25 Jun
ancient13–20.0016%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0213%25 Jun
dust213–10.0321%24 Jun
inferno8–130.0214%24 Jun
anubis13–60.0110%24 Jun
mirage4–13-0.054%24 Jun
dust213–20.0318%24 Jun
overpass16–12-0.0113%24 Jun
cache13–10.046%23 Jun
ancient16–130.0511%23 Jun
nuke5–130.0522%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0220%23 Jun
overpass13–110.0816%23 Jun
inferno13–70.0211%23 Jun
ancient6–130.0425%19 Jun
nuke7–130.0117%19 Jun
mirage13–30.0214%19 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0616%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0612%19 Jun
mirage13–50.0022%19 Jun
overpass13–100.0319%18 Jun
ancient13–30.0512%18 Jun
anubis11–130.0011%18 Jun
dust24–13-0.0420%18 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0210%18 Jun
dust210–13-0.0420%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0220%17 Jun
mirage13–100.0118%13 Jun
dust213–50.0331%13 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0214%13 Jun
mirage13–30.0726%13 Jun
overpass8–130.0813%12 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0022%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0119%12 Jun
dust29–13-0.0225%12 Jun
mirage13–40.0315%12 Jun
overpass13–90.0322%12 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0335%12 Jun
ancient13–90.0121%12 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0223%12 Jun
dust213–8-0.0025%12 Jun
anubis13–50.0316%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0314%11 Jun
mirage13–110.0122%11 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0324%11 Jun
inferno13–70.0313%11 Jun
inferno13–110.0017%11 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0323%11 Jun
anubis12–160.0020%11 Jun
dust24–13-0.0820%11 Jun
ancient8–130.0225%11 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0214%11 Jun
dust213–16-0.0324%11 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0416%4 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0715%4 Jun
anubis13–60.1320%4 Jun
mirage13–70.0435%4 Jun
mirage13–60.1720%4 Jun
anubis13–30.0823%2 Jun
ancient13–70.0318%2 Jun
dust28–130.0032%2 Jun
anubis13–110.0626%2 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0813%2 Jun
ancient13–110.0419%29 May
anubis14–160.0022%29 May
mirage13–9-0.0135%29 May
dust213–11-0.0317%29 May
nuke13–3-0.0010%28 May
dust213–10-0.0126%28 May
anubis13–9-0.067%28 May
mirage13–00.067%28 May
mirage16–120.0011%27 May
dust210–130.0217%27 May
nuke5–130.0212%22 May
overpass16–140.0215%22 May
mirage13–3-0.0232%22 May
nuke8–13-0.068%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →