LEISKA

LEISKA — CS2 Stats

76561198039935643[U:1:79669915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,254Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,866Purple band · top ~21% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24648 of 45775 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLEISKAFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,866 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateWLLLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression4.1
Utility6.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time614ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — debris 9–2
131Biggest win — cache
3Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB22101245%0.01
dust2D1441029%0.00
nukeD1321115%0.00
infernoB105550%-0.00
ancientS97278%0.01
debrisA74357%0.04
mirageD51420%-0.03
poseidonA53260%0.04
anubisS54180%0.01
eldorado31233%-0.02
office21150%0.01
overpass2020%-0.00
shelter110100%-0.01
boulder1010%0.04
train1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

75Matches
56%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
84.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2850%1.3915.5
Ancient6100%1.5017.3
Nuke560%1.0113.2
Mirage425%1.0216.3
Cache4100%1.0614.3
Anubis367%1.5821.7
Inferno2100%2.6624.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
89.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
9.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8811% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0421%29 Aug
ancient9–130.0220%29 Aug
dust23–13-0.0610%26 Aug
cache8–130.0631%26 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0212%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0613%26 Aug
ancient13–90.0344%26 Aug
cache13–20.0426%26 Aug
debris5–9-0.1018%26 Aug
cache13–50.0826%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0313%19 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0511%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.045%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0014%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.0216%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0623%19 Aug
debris1–9-0.0817%19 Aug
poseidon8–80.0428%19 Aug
cache11–130.0318%10 Aug
anubis13–30.0715%10 Aug
ancient13–60.0316%10 Aug
office11–130.0313%8 Aug
inferno11–130.0125%5 Aug
cache6–20.0021%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0016%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.069%5 Aug
eldorado6–9-0.0827%5 Aug
debris9–40.0923%5 Aug
cache10–130.0414%4 Aug
inferno13–50.0314%4 Aug
poseidon5–9-0.0429%4 Aug
debris9–60.0620%4 Aug
dust210–130.0119%3 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0024%3 Aug
dust215–150.0624%3 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0523%3 Aug
mirage13–70.049%3 Aug
dust213–160.0919%3 Aug
eldorado9–60.0328%3 Aug
poseidon9–70.1121%3 Aug
debris9–20.2310%3 Aug
nuke6–130.0223%2 Aug
nuke13–70.1016%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0513%2 Aug
inferno11–130.0117%2 Aug
nuke11–130.0225%2 Aug
cache13–10.1119%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0517%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0516%2 Aug
dust213–90.0414%2 Aug
debris6–9-0.0310%2 Aug
poseidon9–3-0.0333%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0312%30 Jul
dust213–100.0117%30 Jul
eldorado5–9-0.0024%30 Jul
debris9–70.1125%30 Jul
shelter13–7-0.0126%11 Jul
boulder8–130.0428%11 Jul
dust22–13-0.114%9 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0029%9 Jul
cache8–130.0117%9 Jul
nuke11–130.0022%9 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0425%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0512%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0216%7 Jul
cache2–13-0.0535%7 Jul
cache4–13-0.0017%7 Jul
cache13–3-0.0022%7 Jul
cache13–70.0119%7 Jul
cache12–12-0.0914%7 Jul
cache13–90.0920%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0720%28 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0211%28 Jun
office13–5-0.0122%28 Jun
ancient13–70.1419%28 Jun
cache13–8-0.0335%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0312%28 Jun
inferno13–70.0314%28 Jun
nuke8–130.0317%28 Jun
dust213–40.0424%24 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0319%24 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0423%24 Jun
anubis3–13-0.046%24 Jun
poseidon9–40.1211%17 Jun
nuke15–15-0.039%17 Jun
dust210–130.0322%17 Jun
dust213–100.0514%17 Jun
nuke4–130.0239%15 Jun
cache13–20.0124%15 Jun
train5–13-0.0518%15 Jun
cache13–110.0225%15 Jun
overpass6–130.0320%15 Jun
dust26–130.0120%15 Jun
cache5–13-0.069%13 Jun
cache10–13-0.0626%13 Jun
cache8–13-0.0111%13 Jun
inferno16–14-0.019%12 Jun
overpass5–13-0.035%11 Jun
nuke10–130.0011%11 Jun
anubis13–100.0017%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →