Nico — CS2 Stats

76561198036349597[U:1:76083869]

158Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNicoFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51441Last 9653%Win rateLWLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression8.0
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time581ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 96 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — vertigo 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
28Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA23131057%-0.00
ancientA1610663%0.00
infernoS1510567%0.04
overpassB157847%0.00
anubisD81713%-0.01
mirageA53260%0.01
dust241325%-0.03
cache330100%0.03
vertigo31233%0.05
boulder110100%0.09
cache_b1010%-0.07
train1010%-0.08
tuscan110100%0.02

Across the last 96 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

475Matches
53%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
76.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1464%0.9514.0
Nuke956%0.9916.2
Ancient771%1.0715.4
Vertigo667%1.1319.7
Mirage667%0.9812.2
Anubis617%0.9614.2
Overpass250%0.7210.0
Dust2250%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
576msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.34HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3661% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.0413%22 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0020%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0313%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0318%18 Aug
cache13–7-0.039%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0117%18 Aug
anubis11–130.0315%18 Aug
cache13–80.0617%18 Aug
nuke12–20.0621%18 Aug
nuke7–10.0224%18 Aug
ancient13–110.019%18 Aug
nuke13–50.0018%16 Aug
ancient4–130.0222%16 Aug
boulder13–90.0919%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0817%11 Jul
overpass13–90.1021%16 Jun
dust25–13-0.0314%21 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0424%21 Apr
overpass1–13-0.0850%24 Mar
cache_b5–13-0.0719%24 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0719%17 Mar
nuke1–13-0.0817%15 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0017%15 Feb
nuke6–130.0122%15 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0010%15 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0329%12 Feb
mirage13–70.0130%9 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0416%9 Jan
ancient11–130.019%9 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0615%9 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0126%9 Dec
overpass13–60.0116%9 Dec
nuke13–10-0.0016%9 Dec
train4–13-0.0815%4 Jul
dust25–13-0.0516%9 Oct
dust21–13-0.0613%20 May
anubis9–13-0.0715%29 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0519%20 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0613%9 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0612%9 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0015%6 Mar
ancient13–90.1316%6 Mar
overpass13–70.0316%6 Mar
ancient13–11-0.037%6 Mar
nuke6–1-0.0031%2 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0410%1 Mar
inferno16–130.0110%1 Mar
ancient13–40.0511%1 Mar
ancient13–110.0011%29 Feb
overpass10–130.0511%28 Feb
vertigo4–13-0.0518%28 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0118%27 Feb
inferno15–150.0117%27 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0216%27 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0216%27 Feb
dust213–60.0113%26 Feb
inferno13–30.0926%26 Feb
vertigo13–20.2123%26 Feb
overpass11–0-0.026%25 Feb
nuke13–50.0211%25 Feb
anubis13–30.0515%25 Feb
nuke10–130.0624%25 Feb
inferno13–160.0318%19 Feb
anubis10–13-0.010%15 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0515%9 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0529%7 Feb
nuke13–30.028%27 Sept
overpass12–160.1017%27 Sept
nuke5–30.0331%26 Sept
inferno13–50.0419%26 Sept
anubis5–130.0615%26 Sept
ancient13–10.0131%26 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0021%25 Sept
inferno11–160.0316%18 Sept
nuke9–16-0.073%17 Sept
overpass16–12-0.0012%16 Sept
vertigo6–16-0.0117%16 Sept
anubis7–16-0.0819%24 Apr
tuscan16–90.0213%24 Apr
ancient16–10-0.049%16 Apr
nuke11–160.0113%16 Apr
nuke12–160.0319%3 Apr
inferno16–100.1121%3 Apr
inferno16–100.0415%27 Mar
mirage12–160.0713%26 Mar
cache16–140.0513%26 Mar
inferno16–80.039%26 Mar
nuke13–16-0.089%27 Feb
nuke16–50.0321%5 Feb
mirage8–16-0.0115%25 Jan
overpass11–160.0422%25 Dec
inferno16–100.0119%8 Jul
inferno16–70.1413%20 Nov
mirage16–120.0021%25 Jul
inferno14–160.0010%11 Jul
overpass4–160.0017%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →