X@er0'_ — CS2 Stats

76561198035586572[U:1:75320844]✓ No bans

1,644Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,610Pink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9324 of 24054 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning46

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–49–7Last 10044%Win rateLWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4

Aggression6.1

Utility7.0

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning4.6

Utility7.0

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time561ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — ancient 5–1

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 29% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.02
inferno	C	18	8–10	44%	0.03
ancient	D	17	5–12	29%	0.04
cache	B	17	9–8	53%	0.06
nuke	D	15	5–10	33%	0.01
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
dust2	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

652Matches

53%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

65.7ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	21	52%	0.83	12.7
Inferno	12	58%	0.94	13.3
Anubis	11	27%	0.78	12.1
Dust2	10	30%	0.81	12.8
Ancient	5	20%	0.72	10.4
Nuke	4	75%	1.37	14.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.67	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

87.5%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

553msReaction time

27.5%T opening success

43.6%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

6.3%Flash assists

11.85HE damage / grenade

17.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.5389% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	-0.01	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	16%	28 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	17%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.08	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	9%	22 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.04	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	38%	17 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.08	8%	17 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.08	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	5–1	0.23	28%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–10	-0.05	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.05	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.07	28%	14 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.03	18%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.01	18%	12 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	36%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.07	18%	11 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.13	34%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	11%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	20%	10 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.09	33%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.05	32%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.09	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	11%	6 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.13	17%	5 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.07	27%	5 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.01	14%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.09	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.07	29%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.21	18%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	31%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.10	16%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.12	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	20%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.17	23%	30 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.08	25%	29 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.10	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	31%	29 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	1–9	-0.19	21%	29 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.06	16%	28 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	12%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	26%	25 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	18%	24 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.02	22%	24 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.05	14%	23 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.06	15%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.04	16%	23 Jul →
boulder	13–7	0.00	0%	23 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	23%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	14%	22 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	23%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.08	9%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	19%	20 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	25%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	5–6	0.05	15%	18 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.00	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	27%	18 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	17%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.05	25%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	23%	15 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.03	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.05	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	14%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	17%	13 Jul →
nuke	2–13	0.01	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.05	30%	12 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	22%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	31%	11 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	15%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	23%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.08	12%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.09	20%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	22%	9 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	21%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.10	28%	7 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.01	14%	7 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	15%	6 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	14%	6 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.00	25%	5 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	24%	4 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.20	12%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	34%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	28%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–7	0.10	21%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.18	37%	2 Jul →