nocare — CS2 Stats

76561198033560757[U:1:73295029]✓ No bans

822Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnocareFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression4.6
Utility6.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time589ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–7
130Biggest win — overpass
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 28mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA28171161%0.02
infernoB179853%0.00
overpassA169756%0.02
ancientC146843%-0.02
anubisB84450%0.02
mirageD62433%-0.02
dust2C52340%-0.00
cache41325%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.06
train1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
79.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache1844%1.0314.7
Nuke1040%1.0416.4
Overpass875%1.4018.8
Inferno4100%1.6019.0
Mirage450%1.0111.0
Dust220%0.8613.0
Anubis250%1.3216.0
Ancient2100%1.7019.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
581msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
12.10HE damage / grenade
7.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.3916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke14–160.0220%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0417%20 Aug
nuke13–50.1119%20 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0616%1 Aug
anubis13–90.099%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0614%10 Jul
nuke13–100.1111%10 Jul
inferno6–130.0214%13 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0119%9 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0811%7 Jun
overpass13–110.0015%7 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0016%6 Jun
cache13–10-0.0316%6 Jun
nuke2–00.0867%6 Jun
vertigo13–110.0614%6 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0229%6 Jun
anubis16–120.0114%5 Jun
dust20–11-0.025%5 Jun
nuke16–130.0217%5 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0218%5 Jun
nuke13–70.1413%5 Jun
cache6–13-0.0520%5 Jun
overpass10–130.0512%4 Jun
overpass13–90.049%4 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0320%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0226%3 Jun
nuke13–110.057%3 Jun
nuke5–130.0411%2 Jun
ancient13–70.0514%2 Jun
nuke15–150.0110%31 May
ancient2–13-0.036%31 May
inferno7–130.0317%31 May
nuke13–80.0411%31 May
mirage3–13-0.0815%31 May
mirage13–9-0.0117%31 May
dust213–80.0419%29 May
anubis6–13-0.0316%29 May
nuke13–80.019%29 May
ancient13–80.0015%29 May
ancient8–13-0.0310%29 May
inferno3–13-0.0312%29 May
nuke13–10-0.049%29 May
anubis11–13-0.0421%29 May
nuke5–13-0.0417%29 May
nuke13–10-0.0011%29 May
overpass13–100.0922%28 May
nuke2–13-0.137%28 May
inferno13–6-0.049%28 May
inferno13–90.0111%28 May
nuke6–13-0.0127%28 May
inferno7–130.0516%28 May
overpass5–130.0121%27 May
ancient6–13-0.0516%26 May
overpass5–130.0412%25 May
inferno13–10-0.0016%25 May
overpass13–80.0220%25 May
inferno13–30.0415%24 May
ancient13–9-0.0210%24 May
nuke13–80.0213%24 May
overpass13–4-0.0111%24 May
mirage11–13-0.0311%24 May
nuke13–100.0312%24 May
inferno13–100.0623%24 May
nuke13–60.0825%24 May
overpass7–130.0122%23 May
inferno13–100.0616%23 May
nuke13–100.0218%23 May
overpass16–130.0612%23 May
inferno15–150.0120%23 May
ancient13–11-0.0218%23 May
ancient10–13-0.0318%23 May
ancient13–6-0.0216%23 May
inferno13–11-0.0324%23 May
overpass11–13-0.0219%23 May
nuke13–60.0115%23 May
cache11–130.0311%22 May
dust25–13-0.0024%22 May
cache7–13-0.0117%22 May
inferno10–13-0.0314%22 May
dust213–160.0016%21 May
anubis13–80.0720%21 May
nuke13–50.046%21 May
overpass13–00.1012%21 May
nuke5–130.0119%21 May
nuke8–130.0815%21 May
inferno13–40.0515%20 May
nuke13–70.015%20 May
anubis4–13-0.0124%20 May
overpass9–130.0217%19 May
ancient13–90.0216%19 May
inferno13–9-0.0612%19 May
mirage13–100.0517%19 May
dust213–7-0.0417%19 May
anubis8–130.0012%19 May
overpass13–11-0.0212%19 May
nuke10–13-0.0315%18 May
nuke7–13-0.0416%18 May
train5–13-0.105%18 May
anubis16–140.0517%18 May
nuke9–13-0.045%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →