CHEOLSSIBAL — CS2 Stats

76561198033342048[U:1:73076320]✓ No bans

1,466Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48511Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression8.0
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time568ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–6
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB28131546%0.03
dust2C146843%-0.01
mirageB136746%0.04
anubisD113827%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.01
infernoA106460%0.04
cacheS86275%0.04
overpassS54180%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,758Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
83.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217348%1.1616.5
Ancient10944%1.1316.7
Inferno9747%1.2717.2
Nuke9066%1.2716.7
Vertigo8062%1.2917.5
Mirage7745%1.1516.7
Anubis4441%1.0915.4
Cache4267%1.4019.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
576msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
8.42HE damage / grenade
9.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3721% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0434%21 Aug
ancient13–90.1330%12 Jul
ancient13–80.0230%30 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0134%23 Jun
anubis13–100.0911%21 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0534%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0616%17 Jun
ancient13–50.1225%15 Jun
overpass13–30.1034%14 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0719%14 Jun
ancient11–130.0230%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0023%13 Jun
mirage13–80.0332%13 Jun
ancient11–130.0216%10 Jun
ancient11–130.0738%9 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0218%1 Jun
cache10–130.0114%1 Jun
cache13–110.0513%30 May
mirage13–40.0621%30 May
cache13–110.0123%29 May
dust214–160.0437%26 May
dust213–80.0429%24 May
cache11–130.0624%21 May
inferno13–110.0920%21 May
cache13–100.1035%21 May
anubis9–130.0425%21 May
ancient6–130.0724%21 May
dust213–10.0520%20 May
cache13–10-0.0324%20 May
ancient11–13-0.0225%20 May
inferno9–130.0227%20 May
ancient13–70.1033%20 May
ancient4–5-0.0415%19 May
mirage13–70.1026%16 May
ancient14–16-0.0314%16 May
mirage11–130.0121%13 May
nuke9–13-0.0619%10 May
inferno13–90.0313%10 May
ancient6–130.039%10 May
mirage10–130.1133%10 May
ancient13–110.1227%8 May
overpass16–130.0423%8 May
ancient15–150.0517%8 May
nuke1–13-0.077%8 May
overpass13–7-0.0223%2 May
nuke11–130.0319%2 May
ancient13–10.0837%2 May
ancient13–30.0423%2 May
nuke13–70.0430%28 Apr
cache16–130.0619%28 Apr
ancient9–130.0516%28 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0215%26 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0415%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0313%22 Apr
mirage7–130.0324%22 Apr
ancient4–00.0450%22 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0429%21 Apr
inferno13–80.0317%21 Apr
mirage13–50.0330%21 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0032%21 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0324%21 Apr
ancient19–150.0115%20 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0541%20 Apr
dust29–13-0.0630%13 Apr
ancient3–130.0446%10 Apr
inferno10–130.0340%10 Apr
ancient13–100.0137%10 Apr
ancient13–40.0440%10 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0129%10 Apr
dust24–13-0.0338%10 Apr
dust27–13-0.0615%2 Apr
inferno13–60.0117%1 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0112%31 Mar
inferno9–130.0524%29 Mar
dust213–60.0518%29 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0324%24 Mar
mirage13–60.1523%24 Mar
dust213–10-0.0619%24 Mar
inferno13–90.0127%24 Mar
inferno13–30.1537%24 Mar
dust23–13-0.0311%17 Mar
inferno0–13-0.0129%16 Mar
nuke13–160.0223%4 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0330%2 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0148%1 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0424%28 Feb
nuke10–130.0231%27 Feb
dust213–7-0.0411%27 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0321%27 Feb
anubis13–90.0521%27 Feb
dust29–13-0.0134%26 Feb
anubis13–160.0727%23 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0314%21 Feb
overpass13–50.0934%21 Feb
dust211–130.1236%20 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0039%19 Feb
mirage6–130.0657%19 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0324%16 Feb
dust26–13-0.0214%16 Feb
dust25–2-0.120%16 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →