Vulcanium — CS2 Stats

76561198029123003[U:1:68857275]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

850Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,334Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2155 of 29514 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,390 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning63

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63–37Last 10063%Win rateWWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression8.6

Utility5.8

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning6.3

Utility5.8

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time590ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms

Headshot accuracy29.3%+2.1%

first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 81% over 27dust2Weakest map · 55% over 31

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	31	17–14	55%	0.01
mirage	S	27	22–5	81%	0.02
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
cache	S	10	7–3	70%	0.04
inferno	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.11
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (55% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

809Matches

55%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

91.6ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	91	59%	1.35	19.6
Dust2	52	48%	1.23	18.8
Nuke	39	62%	1.43	19.6
Inferno	29	59%	1.27	19.1
Ancient	23	30%	1.02	17.0
Anubis	15	33%	0.98	16.5
Vertigo	8	50%	0.91	14.8
Overpass	7	14%	1.41	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.7%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.0%Spray accuracy

85.7%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

580msReaction time

36.5%T opening success

64.5%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

12.1%Flash assists

10.36HE damage / grenade

5.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.4613% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	-0.00	23%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	36%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	27%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	27%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	17%	10 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.08	25%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–0	-0.02	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	22%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	33%	28 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	31%	27 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	24%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	30%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.06	35%	24 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	42%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.09	32%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	33%	22 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	36%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	33%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	35%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	32%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	12–16	0.04	31%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	28%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.03	26%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	36%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	29%	17 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	35%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	40%	16 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.08	27%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	44%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	32%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	40%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–2	0.06	35%	15 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	23%	14 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	25%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	30%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	24%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	37%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.17	35%	14 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.06	31%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	25%	10 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.09	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.02	24%	10 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.00	29%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	28%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	21%	9 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	40%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.09	56%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	31%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	21%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	30%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.14	44%	2 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	22%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.04	24%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	26%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.06	39%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	36%	23 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	25%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	27%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.13	26%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	12%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.08	38%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.05	29%	8 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	28%	2 Jun →
dust2	16–14	0.00	26%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.08	28%	26 May →
dust2	1–8	-0.24	0%	25 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	34%	24 May →
mirage	16–13	0.01	36%	22 May →
mirage	15–19	0.02	31%	13 May →
overpass	9–13	0.03	25%	1 May →
cache	13–5	0.03	28%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.09	38%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.14	33%	28 Apr →
dust2	4–13	0.05	39%	22 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	41%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.01	23%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	28%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–2	0.04	34%	25 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	26%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	5 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	16%	22 Feb →
mirage	5–13	0.02	44%	11 Feb →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	16%	6 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	6 Feb →
inferno	16–14	0.07	22%	19 Jan →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	24%	19 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.01	27%	5 Jan →
dust2	6–3	0.06	16%	5 Jan →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	19%	30 Dec →
train	7–13	0.08	19%	2 Dec →
dust2	13–1	0.04	24%	2 Dec →
train	11–13	0.05	38%	14 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.04	44%	11 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.06	29%	11 Nov →