glocks1N

glocks1N — CS2 Stats

76561198028982122[U:1:68716394]Steam profile ↗

2,675Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,571Purple band · top ~22.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21808 of 39177 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGglocks1NFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,571 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning64
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression8.5
Utility5.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.7

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time542ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — nuke 13–4
132Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
618In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 81% over 16infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB1991047%0.04
cacheS1813572%0.05
mirageS1613381%0.04
nukeB147750%0.02
dust2B126650%0.02
infernoC114736%0.03
anubisC104640%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
59%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1968%1.1416.0
Mirage944%0.8613.9
Anubis667%1.0320.2
Nuke540%1.7619.0
Inferno450%1.2515.5
Vertigo333%0.8416.7
Overpass1100%1.5420.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
533msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
7.90HE damage / grenade
14.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4646% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0725%30 Aug
nuke13–40.1815%30 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0712%30 Aug
cache10–130.0228%29 Aug
dust214–160.0218%29 Aug
ancient13–100.0831%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0932%29 Aug
mirage11–130.0216%29 Aug
ancient13–40.0518%29 Aug
nuke13–100.0321%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0519%28 Aug
inferno8–130.0224%28 Aug
ancient13–40.0217%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.049%28 Aug
anubis13–160.0217%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0424%26 Aug
cache13–100.0923%26 Aug
anubis14–160.0518%26 Aug
ancient14–160.1215%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0313%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0530%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0123%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0327%24 Aug
anubis13–90.0818%24 Aug
nuke14–160.0216%24 Aug
cache13–30.0922%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0916%23 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0310%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0424%23 Aug
mirage7–130.0017%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0412%22 Aug
mirage13–30.0531%22 Aug
nuke13–20.0629%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0024%22 Aug
anubis13–110.0517%21 Aug
cache13–110.069%21 Aug
dust213–70.1020%21 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0122%21 Aug
mirage13–90.1020%21 Aug
cache13–60.0525%19 Aug
nuke11–130.0116%19 Aug
inferno13–80.0710%19 Aug
mirage13–50.0514%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0314%18 Aug
dust213–70.0126%18 Aug
ancient3–130.000%18 Aug
cache13–100.1029%17 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0015%17 Aug
anubis4–130.0322%16 Aug
nuke7–130.019%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0419%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0211%15 Aug
ancient9–130.0312%15 Aug
mirage13–40.1023%15 Aug
cache13–110.0721%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0730%15 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0118%15 Aug
ancient13–80.1216%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.049%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0211%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0325%13 Aug
cache13–70.0116%13 Aug
mirage10–70.0218%13 Aug
cache13–100.0822%12 Aug
inferno16–140.0724%12 Aug
dust210–130.0724%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0718%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0717%12 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0117%11 Aug
cache13–20.0823%10 Aug
anubis7–130.0723%10 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0222%9 Aug
cache13–80.0512%9 Aug
dust216–140.0422%8 Aug
inferno13–30.1319%8 Aug
ancient14–160.0417%8 Aug
inferno4–130.0336%8 Aug
inferno11–130.0120%7 Aug
ancient13–100.0518%4 Aug
cache13–40.0816%3 Aug
cache13–100.1222%3 Aug
ancient8–130.0623%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0322%3 Aug
ancient13–20.1219%31 Jul
anubis13–40.1422%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0319%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0230%30 Jul
nuke5–130.0113%30 Jul
cache5–130.0122%29 Jul
dust211–130.0018%29 Jul
dust213–30.0823%29 Jul
ancient13–70.0411%28 Jul
cache13–100.0616%27 Jul
dust210–130.0225%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0715%26 Jul
dust213–4-0.0118%26 Jul
nuke8–130.0618%26 Jul
cache0–13-0.0531%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0021%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0311%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →