-LiquiD — CS2 Stats

76561198024726633[U:1:64460905]

2,321Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,902 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-LiquiDFACEITLevel 9 · 1,902 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning39
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48511Last 10048%Win rateWWLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression2.9
Utility5.5
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time581ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–4
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1211In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31161552%-0.00
dust2B2091145%-0.02
ancientC1761135%-0.00
infernoC94544%-0.01
cacheA85363%0.00
nukeA74357%0.01
anubisD62433%-0.00
overpass220100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,753Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage64249%1.0215.8
Dust237551%1.0216.1
Ancient25650%1.0316.7
Anubis13552%1.0216.1
Overpass8746%1.0016.1
Inferno6850%1.0215.2
Nuke6250%0.9615.8
Train3636%0.9315.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
589msReaction time
12.0%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.67HE damage / grenade
12.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.9835% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0125%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0014%23 Aug
dust212–16-0.0122%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0313%19 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0623%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0518%14 Aug
mirage11–130.0126%12 Aug
nuke4–130.0118%10 Aug
dust222–25-0.0019%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0518%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.0117%9 Aug
mirage9–130.0122%8 Aug
cache16–140.0324%8 Aug
mirage10–130.0019%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0133%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0133%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0429%5 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0614%5 Aug
dust213–40.0521%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0126%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0128%31 Jul
cache16–14-0.0520%30 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0221%22 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0713%19 Jul
anubis4–130.0327%19 Jul
mirage19–15-0.0413%17 Jul
cache13–60.0320%15 Jul
dust210–130.0229%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0517%13 Jul
cache16–130.0121%12 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0226%12 Jul
anubis9–130.0427%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0412%10 Jul
ancient5–130.0714%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0521%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%5 Jul
anubis13–30.0425%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0325%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0018%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0017%4 Jul
dust22–13-0.0423%3 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0511%3 Jul
overpass13–80.0022%1 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0216%28 Jun
ancient11–130.0114%22 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0429%21 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0214%20 Jun
dust213–90.0028%20 Jun
mirage13–40.1329%20 Jun
mirage13–90.0411%20 Jun
inferno13–60.1120%20 Jun
nuke13–60.0324%15 Jun
mirage19–16-0.0120%14 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0228%14 Jun
dust25–13-0.0024%2 Jun
dust213–2-0.0115%31 May
ancient12–160.0529%27 May
dust27–13-0.0717%26 May
nuke13–70.0414%25 May
mirage13–10-0.0429%25 May
dust213–5-0.0524%25 May
ancient11–130.0018%23 May
cache7–13-0.0324%23 May
ancient2–13-0.0318%23 May
inferno4–13-0.0715%19 May
inferno13–8-0.0315%18 May
ancient11–130.0128%17 May
dust26–13-0.0323%17 May
inferno13–110.0019%16 May
dust213–9-0.0610%16 May
mirage13–60.0017%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0117%14 May
dust216–14-0.0221%12 May
ancient13–10-0.0614%11 May
inferno13–110.0431%11 May
mirage13–16-0.0414%10 May
dust213–10-0.0222%9 May
overpass13–6-0.0419%6 May
cache12–120.0633%6 May
nuke16–14-0.0218%6 May
mirage11–13-0.0310%4 May
mirage11–13-0.015%1 May
mirage11–13-0.0217%30 Apr
mirage16–130.0735%29 Apr
dust26–130.0222%28 Apr
ancient10–130.0120%26 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0729%21 Apr
dust210–13-0.0516%19 Apr
dust210–130.0221%19 Apr
mirage13–90.0316%19 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0125%19 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0621%16 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0518%15 Apr
nuke12–160.0216%14 Apr
dust25–13-0.0116%14 Apr
ancient5–130.0321%13 Apr
mirage13–100.0623%13 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0821%9 Apr
mirage13–110.0524%9 Apr
mirage13–80.0631%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →