Krantzix

Krantzix — CS2 Stats

76561198024216953[U:1:63951225]Steam profile ↗

1,316Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,326Purple band · top ~15.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13693 of 27168 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,537 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKrantzixFACEITLevel 9 · 1,537 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,326 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning36
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.5
Aggression4.0
Utility7.1
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning3.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time587ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–5
132Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1991047%0.00
anubisC1661038%-0.01
nukeS1611569%0.01
mirageC156940%-0.01
dust2A159660%0.01
ancientC104640%-0.01
cacheA95456%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

556Matches
53%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
77.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5946%0.8713.6
Inferno4558%0.9614.5
Dust24351%0.9414.8
Anubis4058%0.8814.5
Nuke2871%1.0717.1
Ancient2850%0.9314.5
Overpass1155%1.0516.3
Cache6100%1.1016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
576msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
16.7%Flash assists
10.67HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2789% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0310%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0725%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0711%25 Aug
dust213–90.0324%25 Aug
dust213–3-0.0121%24 Aug
dust214–160.0122%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0412%22 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0316%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0128%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.0214%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%19 Aug
nuke16–130.0126%16 Aug
cache13–3-0.0619%14 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0716%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0326%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0314%12 Aug
inferno9–130.0119%12 Aug
ancient6–130.0121%11 Aug
dust216–14-0.0311%11 Aug
nuke13–40.0219%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0412%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0419%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0119%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0414%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0224%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.088%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0416%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0410%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0122%6 Aug
inferno13–70.0333%6 Aug
anubis5–13-0.088%6 Aug
cache13–40.0814%6 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0227%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0913%6 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0615%5 Aug
dust213–70.0420%5 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0112%5 Aug
cache13–110.0123%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.0216%4 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0933%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0427%4 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0512%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0112%1 Aug
dust213–60.0120%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.0814%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0113%31 Jul
inferno11–130.0325%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0512%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0023%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0513%30 Jul
dust25–130.0119%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0314%30 Jul
mirage13–70.0015%30 Jul
nuke13–70.0121%30 Jul
inferno13–70.0218%30 Jul
cache4–13-0.0616%30 Jul
dust213–50.1318%30 Jul
anubis13–100.0219%30 Jul
mirage7–130.0319%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.026%30 Jul
inferno15–150.0522%29 Jul
anubis13–70.0719%29 Jul
inferno13–110.017%29 Jul
nuke13–110.0721%29 Jul
inferno5–13-0.116%28 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0110%28 Jul
anubis5–130.0517%28 Jul
nuke13–20.0826%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0322%28 Jul
cache13–110.0423%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0125%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0221%27 Jul
mirage11–130.0624%26 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0418%26 Jul
inferno13–20.1123%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0515%26 Jul
anubis13–90.0319%26 Jul
inferno7–130.0412%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0813%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0518%25 Jul
inferno13–160.0112%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0116%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0614%23 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0111%23 Jul
ancient12–16-0.049%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.075%22 Jul
nuke9–130.0323%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0415%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0724%21 Jul
dust213–90.0622%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0623%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0719%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0530%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0317%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0213%5 Jul
anubis13–30.1015%5 Jul
dust26–130.0220%2 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0124%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0726%30 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0522%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →