juuds

juuds — CS2 Stats

76561198017464129[U:1:57198401]Steam profile ↗

2,554Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,540Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14551 of 40128 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,720 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuudsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,720 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,540 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression8.7
Utility6.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time540ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 25dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA25151060%0.00
anubisB1991047%-0.01
nukeC1771041%0.00
mirageB136746%0.00
ancientB137654%-0.01
dust2D93633%-0.03
inferno42250%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

904Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2264%1.0814.2
Nuke1963%1.2617.7
Ancient1443%1.1317.0
Inferno1354%1.0514.8
Mirage1233%0.7311.6
Cache978%1.3315.0
Dust2743%0.9814.9
Overpass475%1.4817.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
539msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
59.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
14.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0621%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0719%27 Aug
cache13–20.0937%27 Aug
cache16–140.0421%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0230%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0222%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0734%24 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0815%21 Aug
cache15–15-0.0129%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0324%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0447%21 Aug
cache13–30.0218%21 Aug
mirage12–160.0322%21 Aug
anubis13–50.0525%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0426%19 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0422%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0226%17 Aug
dust213–110.0122%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.0527%17 Aug
anubis7–130.0122%13 Aug
dust212–4-0.0144%13 Aug
ancient13–40.1631%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0119%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0320%12 Aug
nuke13–160.0021%12 Aug
cache9–13-0.0128%12 Aug
nuke13–20.0641%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0728%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0116%5 Aug
anubis4–13-0.065%5 Aug
cache13–40.1034%4 Aug
nuke14–160.0123%4 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0542%2 Aug
ancient13–110.0324%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0129%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0230%2 Aug
nuke13–80.0533%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0526%29 Jul
cache16–12-0.0123%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0124%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0423%26 Jul
cache13–5-0.0329%26 Jul
cache7–130.0324%26 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0219%26 Jul
anubis5–130.0122%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0628%24 Jul
cache13–10-0.0229%24 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0213%24 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0013%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0027%23 Jul
ancient13–70.0328%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0429%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0340%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0817%23 Jul
dust213–00.0625%23 Jul
nuke10–130.0122%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0527%23 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0133%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0521%22 Jul
nuke13–60.0328%21 Jul
cache13–60.0134%21 Jul
ancient6–1-0.0140%21 Jul
cache11–130.0217%19 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0318%19 Jul
nuke13–10.0625%19 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0323%19 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0119%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0024%19 Jul
cache13–10-0.0415%19 Jul
anubis8–130.0324%19 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0145%19 Jul
cache13–70.0232%19 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0212%18 Jul
cache13–8-0.0313%18 Jul
cache9–130.0434%18 Jul
cache13–100.0021%18 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0635%18 Jul
nuke14–160.0334%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0531%18 Jul
cache16–13-0.0015%18 Jul
mirage13–00.0317%18 Jul
cache13–60.0442%17 Jul
anubis13–40.0629%17 Jul
dust23–13-0.0538%17 Jul
ancient13–70.0216%17 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0418%17 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0516%17 Jul
cache4–13-0.0611%16 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0510%16 Jul
cache1–13-0.0845%16 Jul
dust25–13-0.0525%16 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0614%16 Jul
cache13–30.0318%16 Jul
cache5–13-0.0518%16 Jul
cache5–13-0.0236%16 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0527%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0413%15 Jul
anubis13–60.0324%15 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0032%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →