d e r p s y — CS2 Stats

76561198016674971[U:1:56409243]✓ No bans

1,884Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,350Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5903 of 19868 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning39

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateLLWLWLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression5.0

Utility6.3

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning3.9

Utility6.3

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time570ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–3

13–2Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	27	13–14	48%	0.01
inferno	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.01
dust2	D	17	5–12	29%	-0.00
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
nuke	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.02
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	0.00
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,409Matches

51%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

71.0ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	224	54%	1.05	15.1
Dust2	137	50%	1.03	15.2
Inferno	104	42%	0.95	13.7
Ancient	103	49%	0.93	14.2
Anubis	78	50%	0.98	14.5
Nuke	35	54%	0.94	14.6
Overpass	16	44%	0.94	14.4
Cache	10	70%	1.04	16.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.1%Spray accuracy

79.2%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

564msReaction time

24.5%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

6.8%Flash assists

11.12HE damage / grenade

13.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.5017% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	-0.05	32%	28 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	11%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	26%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	16%	28 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	45%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	10%	28 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	16%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	20%	25 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	35%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.08	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–3	0.06	13%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	30%	23 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.00	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	16%	23 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.07	27%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	23%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	18%	23 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.01	22%	23 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	25%	23 Aug →
anubis	5–11	0.02	15%	23 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	16%	23 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	12%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	21%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.12	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	12%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	14%	19 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.09	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	41%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	18%	18 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	20%	17 Aug →
mirage	12–2	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	26%	17 Aug →
inferno	0–3	-0.08	0%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	38%	17 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.03	18%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.03	29%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	38%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	32%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	26%	16 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	27%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	22%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	20%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	37%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.05	27%	15 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	20%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	11%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	32%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	10%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	33%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	22%	13 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	23%	13 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	32%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.13	11%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	30%	13 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.10	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	26%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.06	15%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	15%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	12%	11 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	25%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.03	29%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.00	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	29%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	31%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	15%	9 Aug →