Girth_Brooks

Girth_Brooks — CS2 Stats

US76561198012994315[U:1:52728587]Steam profile ↗

2,568Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 Learning
FaceitLevel 4 · 949 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGirth_BrooksFACEITLevel 4 · 949 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning39
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression4.0
Utility3.6
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning3.9
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time660ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — overpass 13–6
132Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA29161355%0.01
infernoB157847%-0.01
anubisA148657%0.01
dust2B136746%0.01
mirageD124833%0.01
overpassB115645%0.01
ancientC52340%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,085Matches
49%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
72.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5544%1.0014.3
Nuke5048%1.0115.5
Mirage4445%0.9915.1
Ancient4349%1.0013.9
Inferno4240%1.1114.8
Dust23644%0.8713.9
Vertigo2836%0.8814.5
Train367%1.1516.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.2%Headshot accuracy
24.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.6%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
670msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
5.14HE damage / grenade
7.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.9846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0750%14 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0915%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0428%14 Aug
dust22–100.0425%2 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0621%2 Mar
overpass0–8-0.020%2 Mar
nuke13–30.1338%2 Mar
overpass10–130.0126%2 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0429%2 Mar
inferno13–60.0448%2 Mar
inferno13–110.0222%2 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0636%2 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0722%2 Mar
ancient13–90.0331%1 Mar
dust216–130.0225%1 Mar
mirage10–7-0.0521%1 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0416%1 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0025%1 Mar
nuke13–50.0265%1 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0020%1 Mar
anubis13–80.0833%1 Mar
nuke12–16-0.0122%1 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0825%1 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0246%1 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0218%28 Feb
inferno13–90.0126%28 Feb
nuke1–130.0527%27 Feb
ancient2–130.0119%27 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0128%27 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0841%27 Feb
dust26–13-0.0612%27 Feb
inferno13–2-0.0211%27 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0132%27 Feb
inferno7–130.0030%27 Feb
nuke13–110.0720%25 Feb
anubis13–30.0224%25 Feb
mirage11–130.0231%25 Feb
nuke12–16-0.0820%24 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0212%24 Feb
dust216–13-0.0023%24 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0114%24 Feb
overpass13–70.0239%21 Feb
nuke5–130.0132%21 Feb
dust27–130.0442%21 Feb
nuke13–60.0328%20 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0347%20 Feb
mirage13–90.0845%20 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0014%15 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0225%15 Feb
nuke11–130.0359%15 Feb
anubis13–90.0439%15 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0331%13 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0222%13 Feb
mirage13–20.0835%13 Feb
overpass13–90.0120%12 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0231%10 Feb
dust22–130.0119%10 Feb
dust213–60.0323%10 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0118%10 Feb
nuke13–70.0723%10 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0132%10 Feb
nuke13–20.0613%10 Feb
dust213–11-0.0036%10 Feb
overpass4–130.0321%9 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0317%9 Feb
nuke13–60.1237%9 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0231%9 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0222%8 Feb
anubis9–130.1234%8 Feb
overpass13–60.1525%8 Feb
anubis2–130.0232%8 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0536%6 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0010%3 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0324%30 Jan
dust213–100.0128%30 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0135%30 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0244%30 Jan
mirage14–160.0216%30 Jan
mirage13–50.0333%30 Jan
dust213–60.0120%30 Jan
inferno13–90.0336%30 Jan
dust25–13-0.0631%30 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0030%30 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0329%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0733%30 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0138%30 Jan
nuke13–110.0023%30 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0127%28 Jan
mirage7–130.0132%28 Jan
vertigo7–13-0.0214%28 Jan
nuke7–00.0725%28 Jan
dust25–130.0031%28 Jan
anubis7–130.0122%28 Jan
dust22–130.0433%28 Jan
nuke9–130.0727%28 Jan
inferno16–140.0236%28 Jan
anubis13–80.0923%28 Jan
nuke9–130.0227%24 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0726%24 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0121%24 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →