Krykken :DD — CS2 Stats

DK76561198012284021[U:1:52018293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,745Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,538 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning57

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression5.9

Utility5.5

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning5.7

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time615ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy22.5%−6.6%

first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — vertigo 13–6

13–1Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

21Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 57% over 14anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	32	13–19	41%	0.01
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
vertigo	A	14	8–6	57%	0.03
dust2	B	13	6–7	46%	0.03
overpass	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
anubis	D	9	2–7	22%	0.01
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,956Matches

52%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

89.4ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	221	57%	1.28	18.8
Ancient	131	52%	1.17	18.4
Vertigo	122	56%	1.28	19.4
Dust2	119	39%	1.17	18.0
Anubis	98	31%	1.12	18.9
Overpass	68	56%	1.29	19.3
Train	55	64%	1.26	20.1
Inferno	18	39%	1.00	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

76.6%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

612msReaction time

26.7%T opening success

55.0%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.0%Flash assists

11.08HE damage / grenade

8.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.6758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	14–16	-0.02	18%	28 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	25–23	0.07	25%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.07	27%	23 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	24%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.04	28%	11 May →
cache	9–13	0.01	31%	11 May →
nuke	13–3	-0.03	9%	3 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	31%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.01	12%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–16	0.04	37%	27 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	25%	27 Feb →
ancient	16–13	0.04	25%	22 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	24%	10 Feb →
ancient	5–13	0.03	25%	14 Dec →
nuke	13–10	0.06	16%	14 Dec →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	21%	19 Nov →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	19%	19 Nov →
dust2	13–3	0.08	32%	14 Nov →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	16%	6 Nov →
overpass	3–13	-0.04	21%	2 Nov →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	26%	22 Oct →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	26%	12 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.03	25%	12 Oct →
nuke	14–16	0.01	21%	29 Sept →
overpass	13–6	0.05	17%	29 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.07	19%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	11%	31 Aug →
train	13–8	0.04	23%	31 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	21%	5 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	29%	15 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	26%	14 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	19%	8 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	31%	25 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	24%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	7%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.04	28%	1 Jun →
train	13–9	-0.01	20%	1 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	30%	28 May →
mirage	16–13	0.10	16%	4 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	36%	4 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.04	19%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.09	30%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.04	19%	25 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	21%	24 Mar →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	29%	28 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	38%	19 Feb →
anubis	10–13	0.01	28%	16 Feb →
ancient	11–13	0.02	24%	3 Feb →
dust2	13–10	0.01	23%	31 Jan →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	10%	15 Jan →
ancient	11–13	0.04	27%	12 Jan →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	24%	20 Dec →
anubis	15–19	0.09	15%	20 Dec →
nuke	13–4	0.07	39%	20 Dec →
nuke	16–14	0.08	31%	14 Dec →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	44%	28 Nov →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	33%	17 Nov →
vertigo	13–8	0.10	25%	17 Nov →
nuke	10–13	0.03	28%	13 Nov →
vertigo	8–13	0.05	32%	6 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.00	29%	15 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.02	31%	9 Sept →
nuke	16–14	0.04	30%	9 Sept →
anubis	19–17	-0.01	23%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–19	0.01	20%	25 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	28%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.00	26%	12 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.16	43%	16 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.10	27%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.11	26%	9 Jun →
ancient	12–16	0.00	23%	3 Jun →
anubis	16–12	0.06	30%	3 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.05	27%	19 May →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	33%	6 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.07	23%	5 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.01	26%	17 Mar →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	16%	10 Mar →
nuke	15–15	0.04	24%	10 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.03	26%	9 Mar →
overpass	16–12	-0.00	23%	9 Mar →
nuke	12–1	0.05	29%	9 Mar →
overpass	13–8	0.07	25%	9 Mar →
vertigo	12–1	0.06	26%	28 Jan →
vertigo	3–13	0.01	34%	23 Jan →
overpass	11–13	0.03	34%	13 Jan →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	24%	8 Jan →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	48%	8 Jan →
vertigo	2–13	-0.03	29%	8 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	0.06	16%	2 Dec →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	46%	11 Oct →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	25%	11 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	-0.02	31%	7 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	24%	6 Oct →
overpass	11–13	0.03	24%	6 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	0.06	39%	6 Oct →
overpass	13–7	0.11	36%	5 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.00	33%	5 Oct →
vertigo	3–13	-0.11	31%	16 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.11	34%	16 Sept →