The Moon Boy — CS2 Stats

76561198009053427[U:1:48787699]

4,506Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,037Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1031 of 6572 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,037Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,037
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,963 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe Moon BoyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,037 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning37
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateLLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression4.8
Utility3.9
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch6.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning3.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time595ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — inferno 13–10
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1910953%-0.01
ancientS1813572%-0.02
dust2C1771041%-0.02
infernoC156940%-0.03
nukeB126650%-0.02
anubisA127558%-0.03
cacheD72529%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

365Matches
57%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24163%0.9015.4
Mirage4171%1.1217.1
Inferno3244%1.0015.6
Anubis2662%0.9816.0
Ancient1942%1.0016.6
Nuke1547%0.9314.1
Cache540%0.8613.6
Vertigo250%1.0819.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
581msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
4.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4636 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.196% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–130.0425%28 Aug
cache4–13-0.0914%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0216%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0115%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0618%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%27 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0322%27 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0150%27 Aug
dust213–100.0124%27 Aug
dust216–14-0.0525%27 Aug
ancient13–100.0423%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0417%27 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0115%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0130%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0421%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0233%27 Aug
cache1–13-0.0930%27 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0119%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0113%26 Aug
anubis13–30.0812%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0118%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0813%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0419%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0117%25 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0714%25 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0119%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0832%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%22 Aug
cache11–13-0.0813%22 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0026%22 Aug
nuke0–7-0.137%20 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0932%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0315%19 Aug
dust213–00.0225%19 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0413%19 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0115%19 Aug
dust24–130.0322%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0717%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0322%19 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0017%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0221%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1016%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0815%16 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0317%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0615%12 Aug
dust26–130.0227%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0016%8 Aug
cache5–120.0334%8 Aug
nuke13–110.016%8 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0222%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0020%8 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0419%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0413%6 Aug
cache13–8-0.0218%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0215%5 Aug
nuke10–130.0111%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0413%5 Aug
anubis11–70.0431%4 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0514%31 Jul
dust213–40.0227%31 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0814%31 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0725%31 Jul
mirage7–130.0115%30 Jul
dust212–160.0115%30 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0420%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0715%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0610%30 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0654%30 Jul
nuke0–13-0.010%30 Jul
dust213–4-0.0442%30 Jul
mirage13–00.0617%29 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0322%29 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0610%29 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0728%29 Jul
mirage16–130.0515%29 Jul
ancient13–100.0611%29 Jul
cache4–13-0.0712%29 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0318%29 Jul
dust213–3-0.0336%28 Jul
anubis13–8-0.039%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0020%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0720%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.0516%25 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0127%25 Jul
mirage7–130.0115%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0923%24 Jul
anubis13–10-0.036%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0411%24 Jul
cache13–70.0122%24 Jul
mirage13–50.0615%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.097%23 Jul
mirage8–1-0.0143%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0512%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0210%23 Jul
dust20–13-0.000%23 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0614%23 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0227%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.047%23 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0120%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0515%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →