Zenstax

Zenstax — CS2 Stats

76561198008151435[U:1:47885707]Steam profile ↗

321Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZenstaxFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2
Aggression7.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time530ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — overpass 12–12
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23121152%0.04
ancientC146843%0.01
dust2A116555%0.02
mirageC114736%0.01
infernoS118373%0.04
anubisD103730%0.00
overpassA95456%0.09
cacheB63350%-0.02
train32167%-0.02
debris1010%-0.13
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

331Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
85.9ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3241%1.0114.5
Dust21963%1.2821.0
Anubis1429%1.0117.0
Ancient1377%1.5319.5
Nuke4100%1.0812.3
Overpass3100%1.2316.3
Inferno250%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
43.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
51.8%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
531msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
4.65HE damage / grenade
9.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0513%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0319%25 Aug
cache13–90.0519%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0413%11 Aug
ancient13–90.0316%6 Aug
dust29–130.0511%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0622%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0524%5 Aug
inferno7–130.0130%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.064%3 Aug
anubis6–130.0414%25 Jul
debris4–9-0.1311%25 Jul
dust213–00.1542%24 Jul
mirage13–70.007%23 Jul
train11–13-0.0115%22 Jul
nuke11–130.0417%22 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0117%21 Jul
nuke6–130.0212%21 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0110%20 Jul
anubis10–130.0613%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0716%20 Jul
nuke0–5-0.055%20 Jul
anubis4–13-0.055%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0116%19 Jul
nuke13–80.0118%18 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0311%18 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0115%18 Jul
overpass13–60.1417%17 Jul
mirage13–50.0519%17 Jul
dust213–50.0912%17 Jul
dust212–12-0.0424%17 Jul
cache2–5-0.0219%17 Jul
dust213–110.0114%17 Jul
ancient13–100.0721%16 Jul
dust28–3-0.0110%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0124%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0512%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0615%13 Jul
mirage7–13-0.077%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0118%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0710%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.129%10 Jul
dust213–100.0613%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0515%10 Jul
dust21–13-0.0315%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0825%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%9 Jul
inferno13–20.0321%9 Jul
train13–8-0.0314%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0112%3 Jul
overpass12–120.1712%3 Jul
ancient13–70.129%3 Jul
nuke13–20.0812%3 Jul
ancient11–130.1316%2 Jul
nuke13–90.089%2 Jul
train13–6-0.034%2 Jul
nuke13–70.0110%1 Jul
nuke13–30.0411%1 Jul
nuke13–10.1012%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0413%30 Jun
ancient10–130.0321%30 Jun
nuke13–100.0611%30 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0115%30 Jun
cache13–90.0223%28 Jun
ancient7–130.0027%28 Jun
cache7–13-0.0314%26 Jun
inferno6–130.0217%17 Jun
dust28–130.0320%17 Jun
anubis13–110.1123%17 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0812%17 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0216%16 Jun
mirage13–100.0514%16 Jun
mirage7–130.0813%16 Jun
inferno13–100.0021%16 Jun
nuke13–30.0921%16 Jun
overpass0–60.009%13 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0019%13 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0514%12 Jun
overpass13–40.1115%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0815%12 Jun
ancient2–130.0115%11 Jun
nuke12–120.1012%11 Jun
overpass13–70.1219%10 Jun
overpass13–80.1415%10 Jun
nuke11–130.1528%10 Jun
overpass9–130.0315%9 Jun
nuke13–30.0326%9 Jun
nuke12–120.0822%9 Jun
inferno13–50.0322%9 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0514%9 Jun
inferno13–40.1212%8 Jun
overpass10–130.0511%8 Jun
overpass13–20.0125%8 Jun
ancient1–7-0.1314%31 May
inferno6–20.1412%31 May
inferno13–7-0.0213%31 May
mirage14–16-0.0715%30 May
inferno8–130.0130%30 May
nuke6–130.0219%30 May
ancient8–13-0.055%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →