Graiiny.-

Graiiny.- — CS2 Stats

CA76561198007894158[U:1:47628430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,784Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#48144 of 50144 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,375 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,375Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,375
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 156 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGraiiny.-FACEITLevel 6 · 1,375 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,375csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning38
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54451Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression5.3
Utility6.3
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.8

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 730ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time735ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 724ms → last ⅓ avg 735ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–2
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2718967%0.01
dust2A169756%-0.01
anubisS1510567%0.01
mirageD1431121%-0.02
ancientB136746%0.00
overpassC73443%0.00
infernoS65183%0.02
cache1010%-0.09
vertigo1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

206Matches
53%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
77.1ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3345%1.0115.8
Nuke2552%1.2217.8
Dust22162%1.1014.7
Anubis2055%1.4817.9
Inferno1776%1.0514.8
Ancient1443%0.9216.0
Overpass714%0.639.6
Train333%1.0413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
92.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
730msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
14.68HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 729.6208ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.888% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–3-0.0328%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0113%21 Aug
inferno13–100.0231%10 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0136%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0619%9 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0415%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0218%5 Jul
dust213–60.0527%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0236%5 Jul
anubis13–80.0229%5 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0123%4 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0214%4 Jul
cache5–13-0.0950%4 Jul
dust210–13-0.0542%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0023%1 Jul
nuke13–80.0227%29 Jun
nuke7–12-0.0024%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.0231%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0117%28 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0617%27 Jun
anubis8–13-0.1119%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0016%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0427%27 Jun
overpass13–60.039%27 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0315%27 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0820%26 Jun
ancient12–160.0422%25 Jun
nuke13–40.0717%25 Jun
overpass13–100.0121%25 Jun
dust213–100.0443%25 Jun
nuke13–110.0322%24 Jun
dust213–60.0134%24 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0124%23 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0126%21 Jun
nuke13–70.0519%21 Jun
nuke0–130.0037%21 Jun
nuke13–60.0625%21 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0020%21 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0113%21 Jun
mirage13–50.0115%21 Jun
anubis16–120.0020%20 Jun
inferno13–60.0515%20 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0823%20 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0517%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0136%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0425%20 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0227%18 Jun
mirage9–130.0640%18 Jun
nuke11–130.0026%15 Jun
overpass7–130.0949%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0418%14 Jun
nuke13–100.0229%14 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0526%14 Jun
anubis22–200.0530%14 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0112%13 Jun
inferno13–10.0437%13 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0124%13 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0529%12 Jun
dust213–8-0.0825%12 Jun
ancient13–110.0719%11 Jun
dust213–60.0429%10 Jun
anubis13–20.1531%10 Jun
anubis13–70.0738%10 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0116%10 Jun
dust213–40.0339%9 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0325%9 Jun
inferno9–130.0833%8 Jun
ancient13–110.0313%7 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0327%7 Jun
nuke13–80.0512%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0423%7 Jun
dust214–16-0.03100%7 Jun
dust28–13-0.0632%7 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0327%7 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0323%6 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0012%6 Jun
nuke13–80.0122%6 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0213%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0031%5 Jun
dust213–90.0222%4 Jun
anubis10–130.1232%3 Jun
nuke13–80.0516%3 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0719%2 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0023%31 May
nuke13–7-0.0235%30 May
dust211–13-0.0533%30 May
mirage7–13-0.087%30 May
mirage13–70.0430%29 May
overpass13–9-0.0125%27 May
inferno13–6-0.0216%27 May
dust213–100.0827%26 May
nuke13–100.1224%25 May
overpass4–130.015%25 May
ancient9–13-0.0021%25 May
ancient6–130.0126%24 May
anubis13–110.0525%24 May
vertigo12–12-0.0044%24 May
nuke13–100.0433%24 May
nuke13–11-0.0324%24 May
nuke9–13-0.0235%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →