TryReading

TryReading — CS2 Stats

US76561198007398987[U:1:47133259]Steam profile ↗

640Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTryReadingFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning60
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateTWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression6.9
Utility7.0
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.0
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time644ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — cache
12Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A169756%-0.00
mirageA169756%0.02
infernoB157847%0.00
nukeB147750%0.00
anubisS118373%0.02
overpassS118373%0.02
ancientD103730%0.01
cacheB63350%0.01
train110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
47%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
76.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache1050%1.1618.7
Mirage1060%1.0014.0
Dust2825%0.8016.3
Inferno825%0.9513.6
Anubis875%1.2316.3
Nuke633%0.7412.5
Ancient425%0.8412.0
Overpass3100%1.3814.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
646msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
15.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3544% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0820%14 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0111%14 Jul
cache13–70.0113%11 Jul
ancient12–160.0823%2 Jul
anubis13–100.0619%30 Jun
overpass13–50.0622%23 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0015%22 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0113%18 Jun
train13–80.1225%18 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0816%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.035%8 Jun
ancient10–130.0118%7 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0334%7 Jun
anubis13–90.0025%6 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0216%29 May
inferno10–130.0825%24 May
anubis15–150.0318%22 May
dust22–13-0.0832%19 May
nuke13–8-0.0116%15 May
inferno13–50.0120%10 May
anubis13–10-0.0513%10 May
cache16–140.0220%9 May
inferno13–100.0520%9 May
cache13–2-0.0314%2 May
cache9–13-0.0720%29 Apr
mirage10–13-0.029%26 Apr
inferno8–130.0223%25 Apr
nuke13–70.0022%24 Apr
cache9–130.0213%24 Apr
mirage13–30.1426%23 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0515%23 Apr
inferno6–130.0211%23 Apr
inferno5–130.0320%22 Apr
overpass13–20.0918%22 Apr
inferno13–90.0414%22 Apr
nuke8–130.0018%20 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0417%20 Apr
dust29–130.0124%20 Apr
mirage11–130.0220%20 Apr
dust213–4-0.0118%20 Apr
dust213–60.0517%20 Apr
mirage7–13-0.055%20 Apr
ancient13–30.0220%20 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0219%20 Apr
anubis13–110.0320%20 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0212%19 Apr
mirage13–70.0015%19 Apr
ancient11–130.0220%19 Apr
anubis13–70.0614%17 Apr
dust214–16-0.0219%16 Apr
mirage13–60.0916%16 Apr
dust23–13-0.0411%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0317%14 Apr
overpass13–90.0228%14 Apr
nuke13–100.029%14 Apr
ancient13–80.0520%14 Apr
overpass13–70.0722%14 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0213%13 Apr
dust213–90.0524%13 Apr
dust216–14-0.0011%13 Apr
mirage13–90.0612%12 Apr
mirage13–60.0618%12 Apr
dust213–70.0222%12 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0021%12 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0420%12 Apr
overpass11–130.0011%12 Apr
anubis8–130.0512%12 Apr
ancient12–16-0.069%12 Apr
dust213–7-0.0311%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0412%12 Apr
overpass13–70.0318%12 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0410%11 Apr
nuke13–70.0821%11 Apr
dust213–110.0114%11 Apr
inferno16–12-0.018%11 Apr
dust213–100.0123%11 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0112%11 Apr
ancient8–130.0819%11 Apr
inferno13–11-0.026%10 Apr
mirage13–3-0.027%10 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0016%10 Apr
mirage16–140.0516%9 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0514%9 Apr
anubis7–130.0024%9 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0417%9 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0110%9 Apr
mirage13–70.0314%9 Apr
dust213–70.0819%9 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0410%8 Apr
overpass13–50.0323%8 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0323%8 Apr
dust215–15-0.0412%8 Apr
nuke8–130.0819%8 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0225%8 Apr
inferno13–50.0136%7 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0021%6 Apr
mirage6–130.0417%6 Apr
dust28–13-0.0117%4 Apr
mirage13–80.0124%30 Mar
anubis13–80.0120%25 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →