UNNAMED — CS2 Stats

76561198007187167[U:1:46921439]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,046Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60

Positioning35

Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–44–10Last 10046%Win rateWLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0

Aggression1.3

Utility3.3

Positioning3.5

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch7.2

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0

Positioning3.5

Utility3.3

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time620ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 9–3

13–1Biggest win — anubis

10Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 30overpassWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	30	17–13	57%	0.02
nuke	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.01
mirage	C	16	7–9	44%	0.00
overpass	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.03
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
cache	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.10
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.19
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches

56%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

78.0ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	11	82%	1.31	15.0
Anubis	8	50%	1.28	14.9
Ancient	7	29%	0.75	11.7
Inferno	4	50%	1.19	13.5
Vertigo	2	50%	0.78	11.5
Overpass	1	0%	0.64	9.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.65	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.1%Spray accuracy

83.8%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

621msReaction time

21.2%T opening success

23.4%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

6.64HE damage / grenade

3.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4161 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.2445% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–3	-0.01	8%	5 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	13%	5 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	9%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	19%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	12%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	27%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	23%	13 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.04	16%	13 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.07	22%	13 Jul →
eldorado	9–5	0.19	24%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	22%	12 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	11%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	15%	10 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.01	22%	7 Jul →
poseidon	3–9	-0.13	7%	3 Jul →
vertigo	9–6	-0.01	13%	1 Jul →
inferno	9–1	0.23	24%	1 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.02	14%	30 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	8%	27 Jun →
nuke	7–9	-0.06	19%	27 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.11	10%	27 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	13%	24 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.01	15%	24 Jun →
overpass	4–9	-0.02	13%	24 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.04	15%	24 Jun →
anubis	9–1	-0.01	7%	23 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	12%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	3%	23 Jun →
inferno	7–9	-0.13	21%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.03	20%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	21%	21 Jun →
overpass	8–8	-0.02	12%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–6	0.01	18%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.15	11%	17 Jun →
overpass	0–9	-0.32	0%	17 Jun →
nuke	6–9	-0.03	18%	17 Jun →
overpass	8–8	0.00	14%	14 Jun →
nuke	9–3	0.03	21%	14 Jun →
inferno	9–7	-0.07	8%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	14%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.03	23%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.00	5%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	18%	11 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.10	16%	11 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.08	15%	10 Jun →
nuke	9–6	0.02	16%	7 Jun →
nuke	8–8	-0.07	21%	7 Jun →
inferno	7–9	-0.03	8%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.14	9%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.13	18%	7 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.04	18%	29 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	19%	26 May →
overpass	8–8	0.07	19%	25 May →
inferno	9–3	0.25	11%	25 May →
mirage	6–13	0.02	21%	21 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	13%	17 May →
nuke	13–4	0.05	16%	17 May →
anubis	13–10	0.05	15%	17 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	30%	17 May →
cache	13–9	0.05	22%	17 May →
cache	6–13	-0.00	17%	16 May →
nuke	9–4	0.10	27%	13 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	14%	13 May →
inferno	13–5	0.03	20%	13 May →
inferno	1–9	-0.11	25%	13 May →
nuke	6–9	-0.02	17%	13 May →
overpass	9–2	0.12	16%	13 May →
inferno	5–9	-0.03	24%	13 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.08	20%	23 Apr →
mirage	14–16	0.04	15%	23 Apr →
inferno	9–6	-0.08	19%	23 Apr →
poseidon	6–9	-0.07	7%	23 Apr →
nuke	7–9	-0.09	20%	23 Apr →
overpass	8–8	0.05	16%	23 Apr →
overpass	2–9	-0.17	17%	21 Apr →
nuke	6–9	-0.00	20%	21 Apr →
nuke	8–8	-0.08	5%	21 Apr →
inferno	9–7	0.06	18%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.05	9%	9 Apr →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	10%	9 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	7%	9 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.00	18%	9 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	30%	8 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	27%	8 Apr →
anubis	5–13	0.03	19%	8 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.02	17%	4 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	17%	4 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	20%	4 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	21%	4 Apr →
inferno	4–9	-0.08	12%	28 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	10%	20 Mar →
anubis	11–13	0.02	15%	20 Mar →
overpass	9–6	0.02	15%	15 Mar →