enjoyer

enjoyer — CS2 Stats

FI76561198004555298[U:1:44289570]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,503Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,268 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGenjoyerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,268 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning60
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4357Last 10043%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression7.9
Utility5.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time587ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 31% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2681831%-0.01
ancientC2491538%-0.00
dust2A2011955%-0.02
nukeA127558%-0.01
cacheB63350%0.03
infernoC52340%-0.01
anubisC52340%0.01
overpass1010%-0.06
train110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,762Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
84.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage56550%0.9915.9
Ancient32653%1.0616.9
Nuke26352%1.0317.0
Dust222650%1.0216.6
Inferno11746%0.9916.1
Anubis9846%1.0116.8
Train8548%1.0517.1
Overpass7356%1.0617.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
66.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
586msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
59.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
5.42HE damage / grenade
13.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7083% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0416%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0313%22 Aug
dust213–60.0314%22 Aug
nuke13–00.0336%22 Aug
dust216–130.0522%20 Aug
ancient13–50.0518%14 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0417%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0536%13 Aug
dust211–130.0114%10 Aug
mirage6–130.0320%9 Aug
cache8–130.0616%1 Aug
nuke13–80.0521%1 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0713%31 Jul
cache13–100.0415%29 Jul
mirage16–190.0017%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0420%21 Jul
cache13–5-0.0213%21 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0217%21 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0422%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0721%18 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0614%18 Jul
dust213–11-0.0212%17 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0230%17 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0313%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0213%16 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0013%16 Jul
cache13–70.0321%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0117%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0218%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0213%16 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0427%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0217%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0738%12 Jul
inferno8–130.0313%12 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0220%12 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0417%11 Jul
mirage6–130.0013%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0120%11 Jul
dust26–130.0032%10 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0320%9 Jul
dust26–13-0.0427%6 Jul
dust213–50.0729%5 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0214%28 Jun
mirage10–130.0319%23 Jun
ancient13–100.0028%14 Jun
mirage19–17-0.0621%13 Jun
mirage16–120.0220%12 Jun
nuke13–2-0.0218%12 Jun
ancient13–80.0324%12 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0220%12 Jun
dust213–90.0024%11 Jun
ancient13–90.0613%9 Jun
dust213–4-0.0223%9 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0411%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0311%5 Jun
nuke13–9-0.057%4 Jun
anubis8–13-0.026%3 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0212%28 May
ancient6–130.0218%28 May
cache9–130.0420%27 May
anubis13–40.0416%26 May
mirage7–13-0.0415%26 May
nuke7–13-0.0419%21 May
anubis13–30.0223%20 May
dust213–110.0327%20 May
ancient4–130.0731%20 May
mirage4–13-0.0529%18 May
ancient10–130.0314%18 May
ancient9–13-0.0122%18 May
ancient13–11-0.0219%16 May
mirage11–13-0.0231%16 May
mirage6–13-0.0021%15 May
mirage22–190.0015%14 May
anubis5–130.0118%14 May
mirage5–13-0.0615%13 May
cache7–130.0220%12 May
nuke13–8-0.0213%12 May
ancient7–130.0615%9 May
mirage6–13-0.0319%9 May
ancient13–60.0520%7 May
dust21–13-0.080%5 May
ancient9–13-0.0613%4 May
mirage13–70.0017%3 May
nuke10–13-0.0316%3 May
inferno14–160.0116%3 May
nuke9–130.0124%3 May
ancient12–16-0.0713%1 Mar
dust213–11-0.0833%23 Feb
ancient7–13-0.019%21 Jan
dust25–13-0.0813%7 Jan
nuke13–100.0523%5 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0610%5 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0118%4 Jan
nuke16–13-0.037%1 Jan
train13–70.0619%31 Dec
dust213–90.0421%31 Dec
mirage4–13-0.078%29 Dec
dust24–13-0.080%26 Dec
ancient9–12-0.0419%26 Dec
mirage19–150.0319%26 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →