BRETTDESZORN — CS2 Stats

76561198002158069[U:1:41892341]

414Tracked matches76%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBRETTDESZORNFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70264Last 10070%Win rateWLWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression5.6
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time600ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy31.5%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 34.1% → last ⅓ avg 31.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 6vertigoWeakest map · 60% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31191261%-0.01
mirageA2415963%-0.01
ancientS1410471%0.02
anubisS660100%0.08
nukeS65183%0.02
cacheS54180%-0.02
vertigoA53260%-0.03
overpass43175%0.01
inferno220100%-0.01
shelter110100%-0.04
fachwerk110100%-0.05
office110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

331Matches
54%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
85.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1443%1.0716.2
Dust21457%1.3317.9
Anubis875%1.1715.1
Ancient5100%1.3918.6
Nuke2100%1.2217.5
Inferno1100%1.3818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.7%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
91.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
595msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
30.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
8.58HE damage / grenade
9.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.9413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.1228%17 Aug
dust25–13-0.0822%14 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0238%12 Aug
dust213–40.0153%10 Aug
anubis13–100.0941%9 Aug
anubis13–30.1636%9 Aug
mirage13–80.0027%9 Aug
dust29–13-0.0226%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0729%7 Aug
shelter13–10-0.0424%1 Aug
fachwerk13–8-0.0536%1 Aug
anubis13–100.1145%24 Jul
dust216–140.0325%21 Jul
dust28–130.0053%21 Jul
mirage13–30.0244%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0518%20 Jul
dust20–13-0.030%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0734%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0728%20 Jul
ancient16–130.0634%19 Jul
dust219–150.0329%19 Jul
dust213–60.0628%17 Jul
mirage16–130.0340%17 Jul
ancient15–150.0137%16 Jul
dust213–90.0830%15 Jul
inferno13–90.0118%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0129%15 Jul
dust213–90.0635%13 Jul
ancient13–90.0633%13 Jul
nuke13–70.0223%13 Jul
cache13–40.0133%12 Jul
dust213–20.1328%12 Jul
mirage5–130.0134%12 Jul
mirage13–00.0822%11 Jul
dust213–20.0441%9 Jul
cache13–8-0.0724%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0523%5 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0529%5 Jul
cache13–11-0.0237%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.0221%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0228%5 Jul
cache6–13-0.0437%4 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0529%4 Jul
dust27–13-0.0623%4 Jul
cache13–80.0233%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0231%4 Jul
dust213–100.0024%3 Jul
dust213–10-0.0035%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0134%3 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0023%3 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0324%2 Jul
dust213–0-0.0429%2 Jul
overpass13–110.0233%28 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0315%28 Jun
dust213–8-0.0133%28 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0526%28 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0335%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0545%28 Jun
ancient13–90.0421%28 Jun
dust213–9-0.0030%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0230%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.0426%27 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0229%27 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0139%25 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0943%25 Jun
dust213–3-0.0161%25 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0231%24 Jun
dust213–6-0.0742%24 Jun
dust28–13-0.0440%29 Nov
dust29–00.0357%29 Nov
ancient13–10.0340%19 Jul
nuke13–90.0248%31 Mar
ancient6–1-0.0229%31 Mar
vertigo13–50.0835%7 Jan
anubis13–30.0143%7 Jan
mirage13–50.0233%7 Jan
dust213–4-0.0224%7 Jan
ancient13–60.0642%7 Jan
dust210–13-0.0933%6 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0025%6 Jan
vertigo13–8-0.0429%6 Jan
ancient13–70.0923%6 Jan
dust213–8-0.0817%5 Jan
mirage11–130.0331%5 Jan
nuke13–30.0617%5 Jan
ancient12–12-0.0224%5 Jan
mirage11–130.0149%2 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0829%2 Jan
anubis13–30.0937%1 Jan
dust213–10-0.0326%1 Jan
vertigo13–4-0.0344%1 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0121%1 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0548%1 Jan
nuke13–60.0331%1 Jan
overpass13–50.0343%1 Jan
nuke5–130.0535%30 Dec
overpass3–13-0.0142%30 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0638%30 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.1115%23 Dec
office13–8-0.0333%23 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →