-tisstass

-tisstass — CS2 Stats

NO76561198000843896[U:1:40578168]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,927Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-tisstassFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52444Last 10052%Win rateTLLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.5
Aggression4.1
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch8.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time615ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 8–13
130Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25121348%-0.02
infernoA1811761%-0.02
nukeC167944%-0.02
mirageA1610663%-0.01
anubisB105550%-0.02
ancientA74357%-0.01
overpassB63350%-0.03
cache2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
48%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
80.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

62%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%0.8014.0
Dust2757%0.7714.3
Anubis560%1.0514.0
Nuke520%1.0618.2
Ancient367%1.1013.7
Inferno367%1.1214.0
Vertigo10%1.1218.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
13.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6911% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–15-0.029%24 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0514%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.068%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.0213%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0815%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0312%15 Jul
nuke13–60.036%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0013%15 Jul
ancient13–110.0210%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0216%15 Jul
cache12–16-0.0522%9 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0217%9 Jul
dust213–8-0.0223%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0416%26 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0627%25 Jun
dust29–13-0.0032%25 Jun
dust213–8-0.1116%25 Jun
anubis0–7-0.1020%25 Jun
dust213–7-0.019%24 Jun
anubis7–13-0.066%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0918%7 Jun
dust213–7-0.0910%7 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0814%26 May
nuke8–13-0.0618%26 May
inferno13–4-0.0411%22 May
dust28–130.1115%13 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0328%13 Mar
ancient11–13-0.069%12 Mar
anubis13–30.0414%11 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0615%11 Mar
inferno13–20.0717%11 Mar
dust210–130.0016%11 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0210%11 Mar
anubis13–70.0320%11 Mar
dust213–5-0.045%9 Mar
anubis6–130.0022%7 Mar
mirage13–11-0.009%7 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0613%7 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0211%7 Mar
mirage13–40.109%7 Mar
ancient13–30.0926%7 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0117%7 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0112%7 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0217%7 Mar
dust24–13-0.0621%7 Mar
ancient13–50.0421%6 Mar
dust213–110.036%6 Mar
dust25–130.0428%6 Mar
dust213–00.028%5 Mar
dust212–16-0.0420%4 Mar
overpass13–4-0.0819%4 Mar
inferno13–110.0414%3 Mar
anubis13–40.0131%3 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0620%2 Mar
anubis13–100.0014%2 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0917%20 Feb
inferno13–50.018%20 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0623%20 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0326%18 Feb
nuke13–100.0310%18 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0025%8 Feb
dust210–13-0.0511%8 Feb
nuke5–130.0313%8 Feb
nuke13–3-0.0412%2 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0425%2 Feb
anubis13–100.0019%2 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0116%2 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0920%2 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0515%1 Feb
dust27–13-0.0534%1 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0716%26 Jan
dust213–4-0.017%26 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0116%26 Jan
ancient12–16-0.0411%17 Jan
inferno13–80.0117%17 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0513%17 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0214%27 Dec
dust215–150.0218%27 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0020%26 Dec
overpass13–110.0114%22 Dec
dust213–7-0.0316%22 Dec
mirage14–16-0.038%22 Dec
inferno13–100.0521%20 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0515%16 Dec
dust213–7-0.0119%16 Dec
overpass13–3-0.0126%16 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0127%16 Dec
inferno9–5-0.0928%16 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0418%15 Dec
nuke13–100.0233%15 Dec
dust29–13-0.037%15 Dec
nuke9–40.095%15 Dec
inferno4–9-0.1138%15 Dec
nuke14–16-0.0818%14 Dec
overpass15–15-0.0310%13 Dec
inferno9–60.0118%13 Dec
dust21–13-0.036%13 Dec
overpass11–130.0013%10 Dec
dust213–9-0.0519%10 Dec
dust213–11-0.0123%7 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →