ogdans3 — CS2 Stats

76561197997875336[U:1:37609608]✓ No bans

1,926Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,117 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGogdans3FACEITLevel 10 · 2,117 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning58
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49483Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression7.1
Utility6.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time618ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–3
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC27111641%-0.01
infernoB24121250%0.01
ancientB21111052%0.01
overpassA149564%-0.01
cacheS64267%0.02
nuke42250%-0.03
dust22020%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.04
mirage1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

608Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
83.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11752%1.1617.9
Anubis11651%1.1717.1
Inferno9751%1.1416.2
Overpass3465%1.1716.4
Vertigo3348%1.2117.8
Train3266%1.3018.3
Nuke3030%1.1315.5
Dust21471%1.1818.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
622msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
17.4%Flash assists
14.24HE damage / grenade
4.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4265% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.086%25 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0225%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0213%16 Aug
cache6–130.0232%16 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0118%12 Aug
cache13–110.0328%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0037%10 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0320%10 Aug
cache19–160.0328%9 Aug
anubis13–90.0325%9 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0015%9 Aug
inferno4–130.0733%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0128%5 Aug
anubis16–140.0419%5 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0227%2 Aug
ancient13–30.1419%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0111%27 Jun
overpass7–130.0423%27 Jun
cache13–70.0122%29 May
anubis10–13-0.006%11 May
cache13–110.0222%11 May
inferno11–130.0226%4 May
inferno13–8-0.0022%3 May
overpass7–13-0.0813%3 May
anubis13–80.0721%26 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0112%23 Apr
anubis13–70.0419%22 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0131%22 Apr
dust210–13-0.0225%22 Apr
ancient6–5-0.0417%19 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0123%19 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0519%8 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0023%6 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0120%6 Apr
ancient13–100.0321%6 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0520%2 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0221%2 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0311%1 Apr
inferno13–80.0517%1 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0520%1 Apr
overpass14–16-0.0112%26 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0418%26 Mar
nuke13–70.0016%25 Mar
ancient15–150.0431%25 Mar
overpass13–30.0027%25 Mar
anubis13–30.0724%22 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0121%19 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0315%19 Mar
overpass13–3-0.0237%19 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0636%19 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0513%18 Mar
inferno10–130.0329%18 Mar
vertigo12–12-0.0428%18 Mar
inferno13–70.0022%15 Mar
overpass13–50.0021%11 Mar
inferno13–30.0632%9 Mar
ancient8–130.0220%9 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0127%1 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0713%27 Feb
overpass13–3-0.0413%27 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0519%27 Feb
inferno13–10.025%27 Feb
inferno13–110.0020%19 Feb
anubis13–30.1135%19 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0111%19 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0014%18 Feb
ancient13–30.0217%18 Feb
ancient13–00.0428%15 Feb
inferno13–80.0541%15 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0324%15 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0814%15 Feb
inferno13–60.0419%14 Feb
overpass15–15-0.0115%14 Feb
anubis17–190.0023%13 Feb
overpass13–60.0724%13 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0019%10 Feb
inferno5–130.1119%10 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0212%10 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0418%9 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0117%9 Feb
ancient13–10.0926%9 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0219%2 Feb
dust26–13-0.0817%2 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0623%1 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0210%1 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0424%1 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0910%29 Jan
anubis13–60.0821%29 Jan
anubis1–13-0.0423%27 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0019%25 Jan
ancient13–30.1128%25 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0043%25 Jan
anubis13–7-0.0021%24 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0210%24 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0133%24 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0920%23 Jan
ancient13–20.0218%16 Dec
ancient13–50.0815%16 Dec
inferno3–13-0.0711%16 Dec
overpass13–60.0625%16 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →