Farkum

Farkum — CS2 Stats

US76561197989354773[U:1:29089045]Steam profile ↗

248Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42553Last 10042%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.9
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time587ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–9
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1971237%-0.00
ancientD134931%-0.01
anubisC135838%0.01
cacheB137654%0.01
nukeA127558%0.01
mirageD113827%0.00
infernoC104640%0.00
trainC52340%0.03
overpass43175%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
592msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
6.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.0514%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0622%4 Aug
anubis13–100.0516%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0510%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0118%31 Jul
cache3–13-0.077%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.029%31 Jul
dust213–90.1625%29 Jul
anubis7–130.0213%29 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0314%28 Jul
nuke13–70.0426%28 Jul
ancient15–150.0524%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0315%24 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0014%24 Jul
cache13–100.0318%24 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0624%23 Jul
cache8–3-0.0115%23 Jul
dust213–60.0229%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0110%22 Jul
inferno5–130.0112%21 Jul
dust213–40.0920%17 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0419%17 Jul
ancient7–130.0520%16 Jul
dust27–13-0.0611%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0520%15 Jul
nuke13–50.1317%15 Jul
cache13–10.0514%9 Jul
anubis13–20.064%8 Jul
dust25–130.0314%2 Jul
mirage6–130.0518%2 Jul
nuke4–130.0418%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0525%30 Jun
anubis11–130.0320%30 Jun
train12–120.0917%30 Jun
dust213–20.049%29 Jun
ancient13–100.0013%29 Jun
train13–30.108%29 Jun
nuke3–13-0.1715%26 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0417%26 Jun
ancient7–13-0.039%26 Jun
dust27–13-0.019%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0212%26 Jun
nuke13–80.0126%24 Jun
anubis11–130.0123%24 Jun
train10–130.0120%23 Jun
anubis13–90.0619%23 Jun
nuke13–110.0023%22 Jun
cache10–130.0313%16 Jun
ancient2–130.0215%16 Jun
anubis6–130.0410%16 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0216%16 Jun
dust22–13-0.099%16 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0515%11 Jun
train13–10-0.018%10 Jun
nuke11–10.1214%10 Jun
dust213–70.0524%9 Jun
ancient7–130.0216%9 Jun
dust213–100.0515%5 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0516%5 Jun
cache12–12-0.0316%4 Jun
inferno13–60.0315%4 Jun
dust27–13-0.0523%2 Jun
cache13–110.0115%28 May
ancient4–13-0.0415%28 May
inferno13–30.0322%27 May
anubis13–40.0412%27 May
cache11–130.0119%27 May
mirage13–4-0.0210%26 May
ancient13–10-0.0318%26 May
dust28–130.0230%22 May
ancient13–70.0024%22 May
train10–13-0.0219%14 May
cache11–130.0920%14 May
mirage13–80.0215%10 May
ancient13–10.0118%10 May
cache13–20.0724%10 May
dust24–0-0.0122%10 May
overpass13–100.0421%9 May
cache13–90.0116%9 May
cache13–8-0.0316%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.0222%30 Apr
overpass7–130.0319%23 Apr
dust27–13-0.0527%20 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0620%20 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0323%10 Apr
mirage9–130.1019%10 Apr
mirage4–130.0630%31 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0013%27 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0716%27 Mar
nuke6–130.0312%18 Mar
inferno12–5-0.0014%18 Mar
overpass13–40.0321%17 Mar
dust25–13-0.1013%17 Mar
dust28–13-0.0420%13 Mar
overpass6–50.0516%13 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0210%13 Mar
nuke11–130.0018%5 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0213%4 Mar
mirage13–4-0.048%4 Mar
inferno13–90.1318%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →