maver — CS2 Stats

76561197988158266[U:1:27892538]✓ No bans

895Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,395Purple band · top ~22.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8984 of 14812 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmaverPREMIER16,395 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning47
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.0
Utility5.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch6.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time631ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+6.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 12–16
131Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
143In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30171357%0.01
mirageC1971237%-0.02
ancientB147750%0.01
nukeB126650%-0.02
anubisA106460%-0.03
infernoB84450%0.01
cacheC73443%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
0%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke10%0.8517.0
Mirage10%1.0025.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
618msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
9.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–1-0.0021%28 Aug
dust25–00.0833%28 Aug
dust213–90.0332%28 Aug
cache9–130.029%26 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0810%26 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0217%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0226%26 Aug
mirage10–130.0120%26 Aug
anubis13–60.0214%26 Aug
dust216–14-0.0211%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0120%25 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0523%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0226%25 Aug
cache13–90.0322%25 Aug
dust213–90.0839%25 Aug
ancient13–110.0416%25 Aug
mirage15–150.0226%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0331%24 Aug
inferno13–90.0731%22 Aug
anubis4–130.0124%22 Aug
cache7–130.0327%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0530%21 Aug
nuke0–7-0.0536%21 Aug
dust20–13-0.0818%21 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0529%21 Aug
ancient13–110.0211%21 Aug
dust24–130.0619%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0131%20 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0716%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.0430%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0114%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0312%20 Aug
dust213–70.0221%20 Aug
inferno15–150.0517%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1012%19 Aug
ancient2–130.0817%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0118%19 Aug
dust210–130.0427%19 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0213%19 Aug
cache6–13-0.0226%18 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0333%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0324%18 Aug
dust213–70.0639%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0319%18 Aug
cache14–160.0025%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0016%18 Aug
anubis16–140.0222%17 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0411%17 Aug
dust213–50.0825%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0415%17 Aug
dust213–80.0118%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0731%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%16 Aug
dust212–160.1424%16 Aug
dust213–100.1023%16 Aug
ancient6–130.0113%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0220%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0322%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0316%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%15 Aug
anubis0–7-0.170%14 Aug
anubis13–110.0222%14 Aug
mirage15–15-0.059%14 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0118%14 Aug
inferno7–130.0227%14 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0113%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0614%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0215%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0226%12 Aug
mirage15–15-0.039%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.028%12 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0714%12 Aug
dust27–130.0512%11 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0725%11 Aug
dust216–130.0522%11 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0519%11 Aug
cache13–90.0017%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0324%11 Aug
nuke13–50.0421%11 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0114%10 Aug
dust213–70.0119%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0413%10 Aug
nuke13–30.0116%10 Aug
cache13–9-0.0618%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0019%10 Aug
mirage4–7-0.028%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0418%31 Jul
dust214–160.0415%31 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0310%31 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0014%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0616%30 Jul
ancient13–30.038%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0418%30 Jul
dust213–60.0018%30 Jul
nuke13–7-0.018%30 Jul
dust29–130.0216%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0219%29 Jul
ancient13–40.045%29 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0023%29 Jul
ancient9–130.0420%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →