hell_boy — CS2 Stats

76561197986582767[U:1:26317039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

690Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,727Purple band · top ~9.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17766 of 42806 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning59

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateLWWWWTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression2.1

Utility6.7

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.9

Utility6.7

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time604ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy18.5%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — vertigo 13–2

13–0Biggest win — vertigo

6Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	9–17	35%	-0.01
anubis	A	24	14–10	58%	0.01
vertigo	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.02
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	0.04
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.04
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,281Matches

53%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

—ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	53	64%	1.27	15.9
Mirage	49	43%	1.01	14.9
Vertigo	39	46%	0.99	14.9
Nuke	28	54%	1.18	15.6
Overpass	24	62%	1.27	17.2
Ancient	16	62%	1.17	17.2
Inferno	7	43%	0.87	11.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

86.1%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

593msReaction time

5.4%T opening success

39.9%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

7.30HE damage / grenade

5.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 5.4168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.01	34%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.11	24%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.02	11%	10 Feb →
vertigo	13–0	0.11	19%	10 Feb →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	21%	10 Feb →
ancient	12–12	0.07	14%	10 Feb →
nuke	4–13	0.00	30%	10 Feb →
overpass	13–7	0.01	17%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.07	20%	6 Feb →
vertigo	4–13	-0.07	39%	6 Feb →
nuke	13–4	0.07	31%	6 Feb →
anubis	22–20	-0.02	14%	5 Feb →
vertigo	13–10	0.10	31%	4 Feb →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	31%	3 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	13%	30 Jan →
vertigo	4–13	0.01	15%	29 Jan →
anubis	13–6	0.01	11%	29 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	12%	28 Jan →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	11%	14 Jan →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	19%	14 Jan →
nuke	13–16	0.03	22%	3 Jan →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	10%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–10	0.05	18%	23 Dec →
anubis	10–13	0.01	22%	22 Dec →
overpass	13–10	0.02	8%	22 Dec →
anubis	13–5	0.11	17%	22 Dec →
vertigo	16–13	0.05	14%	22 Dec →
anubis	11–13	0.01	9%	22 Dec →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	16%	22 Dec →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	12%	21 Dec →
mirage	19–16	0.04	13%	21 Dec →
vertigo	14–16	0.03	16%	21 Dec →
anubis	13–7	0.09	17%	21 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	21 Dec →
nuke	13–5	0.01	26%	18 Dec →
anubis	13–2	0.02	16%	18 Dec →
overpass	10–13	0.13	17%	17 Dec →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	18%	17 Dec →
anubis	13–9	0.03	19%	17 Dec →
ancient	7–13	0.01	25%	16 Dec →
anubis	13–2	0.02	16%	16 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	21%	16 Dec →
vertigo	13–16	0.03	17%	16 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	29%	16 Dec →
anubis	13–11	0.01	17%	15 Dec →
mirage	13–11	0.05	14%	15 Dec →
nuke	13–11	0.04	18%	15 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	16%	15 Dec →
anubis	13–5	0.04	31%	15 Dec →
mirage	11–13	0.07	31%	15 Dec →
inferno	1–9	-0.12	25%	15 Dec →
nuke	7–9	0.00	30%	15 Dec →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	24%	14 Dec →
mirage	12–16	0.05	19%	14 Dec →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	18%	14 Dec →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	6%	12 Dec →
vertigo	13–1	0.01	15%	12 Dec →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	10%	12 Dec →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	12%	12 Dec →
nuke	13–6	0.07	14%	11 Dec →
overpass	13–3	0.08	29%	11 Dec →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	21%	11 Dec →
anubis	13–10	0.00	12%	10 Dec →
overpass	10–13	0.05	12%	10 Dec →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	10%	10 Dec →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	12%	9 Dec →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	12%	9 Dec →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	19%	9 Dec →
mirage	11–13	0.06	10%	9 Dec →
nuke	13–0	0.11	8%	9 Dec →
inferno	0–13	-0.10	17%	9 Dec →
mirage	13–11	0.02	17%	6 Dec →
overpass	13–10	0.04	20%	4 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.04	18%	4 Dec →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	11%	4 Dec →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	8%	3 Dec →
nuke	13–10	0.07	19%	3 Dec →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	18%	3 Dec →
vertigo	11–13	-0.03	14%	3 Dec →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	14%	3 Dec →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	13%	3 Dec →
inferno	13–9	0.05	16%	2 Dec →
mirage	13–7	0.05	9%	2 Dec →
vertigo	13–2	0.15	26%	2 Dec →
anubis	8–13	0.04	16%	2 Dec →
ancient	16–13	0.01	10%	2 Dec →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	6%	2 Dec →
vertigo	8–13	-0.08	9%	2 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	26%	2 Dec →
overpass	10–13	0.02	23%	2 Dec →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	17%	2 Dec →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	25%	2 Dec →
anubis	16–13	0.04	14%	2 Dec →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	13%	2 Dec →
vertigo	16–14	-0.03	16%	30 Nov →
mirage	4–13	0.01	24%	30 Nov →
vertigo	9–13	0.00	11%	30 Nov →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	28%	29 Nov →
nuke	22–20	0.01	14%	29 Nov →
mirage	9–13	0.01	14%	28 Nov →