Niv.

Niv. — CS2 Stats

US76561197985347692[U:1:25081964]Steam profile ↗

3,180Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,617Purple band · top ~18% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8285 of 14692 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,617Peak Premier on CSDB
1,349Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,349
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,617
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,383 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNiv.PREMIER17,617 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,349csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning53
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression4.9
Utility6.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.3
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time553ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–8
133Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30141647%0.00
mirageD1861233%0.01
infernoC125742%-0.01
ancientA116555%-0.00
nukeB115645%0.04
cacheA95456%0.02
anubisA85363%-0.00
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

388Matches
49%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
76.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9848%1.2815.8
Dust26250%1.2215.3
Anubis4955%1.1614.8
Inferno4945%1.2415.8
Nuke4255%1.2116.5
Ancient4146%1.2917.3
Vertigo3047%1.3616.7
Overpass956%1.2914.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
534msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.34HE damage / grenade
16.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3384% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–130.0216%26 Aug
ancient16–120.0118%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0529%26 Aug
mirage8–130.0617%25 Aug
dust213–40.0229%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0211%24 Aug
inferno7–130.0721%24 Aug
nuke13–80.1321%24 Aug
cache9–130.0211%24 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0413%23 Aug
nuke1–50.0020%23 Aug
dust27–130.000%22 Aug
cache13–100.0633%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0125%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0929%22 Aug
dust20–9-0.0218%22 Aug
ancient13–30.0235%22 Aug
dust213–110.0121%21 Aug
inferno13–90.0235%21 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0423%21 Aug
dust20–13-0.0536%21 Aug
mirage12–120.0315%21 Aug
dust213–60.0314%20 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0718%20 Aug
mirage14–160.0113%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0014%19 Aug
dust213–110.0729%18 Aug
nuke10–130.0732%18 Aug
cache12–120.0138%18 Aug
nuke6–130.0726%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0324%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0329%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0424%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0218%17 Aug
dust213–70.0126%17 Aug
cache13–50.0816%17 Aug
cache13–110.0320%17 Aug
ancient13–40.0318%17 Aug
dust29–130.0314%16 Aug
train1–13-0.040%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0030%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0236%15 Aug
ancient3–130.0015%15 Aug
dust27–130.0217%14 Aug
mirage3–130.0129%14 Aug
nuke4–130.0123%13 Aug
nuke7–50.1019%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0115%13 Aug
ancient13–90.0424%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0116%11 Aug
cache12–16-0.0721%10 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0721%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0130%10 Aug
dust213–70.0522%10 Aug
dust212–12-0.0718%10 Aug
inferno11–130.0331%9 Aug
dust29–130.0230%9 Aug
anubis13–110.0417%9 Aug
dust213–110.0325%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0228%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0219%8 Aug
mirage13–160.0416%8 Aug
dust213–4-0.0313%8 Aug
dust28–130.0425%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0120%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0010%7 Aug
dust213–70.0535%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0521%6 Aug
dust213–70.0340%6 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0311%5 Aug
dust216–14-0.0029%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0112%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0227%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0317%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0526%5 Aug
anubis16–140.0423%4 Aug
mirage9–130.0224%4 Aug
nuke13–30.0327%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0418%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0332%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%3 Aug
dust25–130.0025%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0510%3 Aug
cache13–60.0816%3 Aug
cache12–12-0.0314%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0412%2 Aug
dust213–70.0114%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0922%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0115%2 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0117%2 Aug
dust28–130.0033%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0418%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0626%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.049%1 Aug
anubis10–130.0131%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0914%1 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0414%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.019%31 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0121%31 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0323%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →