Seids

Seids — CS2 Stats

US76561197983609405[U:1:23343677]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,331Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,575Purple band · top ~14.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11706 of 23304 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSeidsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,575 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning41
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWTWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim5.6
Aggression2.8
Utility7.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.1
Utility7.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 16–12
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 52% over 21nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%-0.01
infernoB21111052%0.01
dust2C1881044%-0.00
cacheD124833%0.01
overpassD82625%-0.02
nukeD51420%0.02
ancientC52340%-0.02
anubis31233%-0.02
train21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

418Matches
52%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
82.9ADR
27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
623msReaction time
18.8%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
12.73HE damage / grenade
10.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.8498% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0426%29 Aug
cache15–15-0.0114%28 Aug
mirage13–40.0121%28 Aug
dust24–130.0118%26 Aug
dust210–130.0015%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0412%21 Aug
inferno13–100.0227%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0722%21 Aug
mirage16–120.1226%14 Aug
mirage7–130.0117%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0017%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0014%9 Aug
cache13–50.0212%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0711%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.019%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.0224%8 Aug
inferno2–13-0.115%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0916%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.018%6 Aug
cache13–2-0.0025%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0115%1 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0117%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0224%31 Jul
dust27–13-0.0210%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.029%30 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0611%30 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0421%30 Jul
dust213–80.0121%30 Jul
cache13–60.0615%26 Jul
inferno13–8-0.024%26 Jul
cache7–130.0320%26 Jul
dust213–90.0117%26 Jul
cache11–130.0115%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0023%26 Jul
mirage13–10-0.018%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0513%24 Jul
dust213–50.0018%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.064%24 Jul
dust24–130.038%22 Jul
cache10–130.0615%20 Jul
nuke13–160.0411%19 Jul
cache8–13-0.0533%19 Jul
ancient13–50.0511%19 Jul
nuke13–50.059%17 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0217%17 Jul
anubis13–80.0615%16 Jul
inferno5–130.0316%16 Jul
inferno13–10.058%15 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0514%14 Jul
cache11–130.0230%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0220%10 Jul
dust28–130.0813%9 Jul
inferno13–30.068%9 Jul
inferno13–80.0520%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0325%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.036%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0719%3 Jul
dust28–13-0.0715%3 Jul
overpass13–10-0.014%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0119%3 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0616%29 Jun
inferno9–130.0624%28 Jun
dust216–14-0.0121%28 Jun
mirage14–160.0016%28 Jun
inferno15–15-0.026%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0314%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0514%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0314%27 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0114%27 Jun
overpass15–150.027%27 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0414%26 Jun
mirage13–20.029%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.0221%26 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0218%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.017%26 Jun
nuke10–130.0421%26 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0243%26 Jun
inferno13–20.0413%25 Jun
overpass16–140.0419%23 Jun
nuke9–130.0111%23 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0324%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0118%22 Jun
train12–12-0.0010%22 Jun
dust24–13-0.0319%21 Jun
inferno13–40.0824%21 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0522%21 Jun
ancient13–3-0.055%21 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0713%21 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0420%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0012%21 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0515%21 Jun
inferno12–160.0421%20 Jun
dust213–100.0715%20 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0214%20 Jun
mirage13–10.0615%20 Jun
train13–7-0.0415%20 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0613%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0113%19 Jun
mirage7–130.0211%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →