Hallåröh

Hallåröh — CS2 Stats

76561197980804541[U:1:20538813]Steam profile ↗

771Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongEntry Fragger
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHallåröhFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateLWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.9
Aggression10.0
Utility6.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 70% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 70% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — ancient 13–3
133Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31161552%0.01
ancientS1711665%0.03
infernoA159660%0.03
dust2C135838%0.03
anubisA106460%0.01
nukeC73443%0.03
cache43175%0.04
overpass32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches
60%Win rate
1.48Avg K/D
85.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2471%1.8319.0
Dust21354%1.4516.7
Anubis850%3.3019.0
Inferno650%1.3314.5
Ancient650%1.0213.2
Cache560%1.4921.4
Nuke4100%1.2116.3
Train10%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
6.6°Preaim
589msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
70.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.56HE damage / grenade
13.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1459% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0020%4 Aug
anubis13–80.1023%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0320%26 May
nuke13–80.0026%23 May
ancient13–6-0.0443%22 May
ancient6–13-0.0428%16 May
anubis13–10-0.0320%16 May
mirage2–13-0.0421%16 May
mirage8–130.0220%16 May
dust29–13-0.0123%14 May
mirage13–80.0319%14 May
mirage15–150.0621%14 May
cache9–130.0110%11 May
dust27–13-0.0035%6 May
overpass5–130.0137%6 May
mirage5–13-0.0233%6 May
inferno13–70.0832%6 May
cache13–90.0421%4 May
anubis1–13-0.0436%2 May
mirage13–80.008%2 May
inferno1–13-0.0732%1 May
inferno9–130.0320%1 May
mirage13–60.0632%1 May
anubis7–130.0330%1 May
cache13–110.0122%1 May
cache13–100.0823%1 May
mirage10–13-0.0513%26 Apr
ancient13–110.0222%23 Apr
anubis16–130.0416%23 Apr
mirage13–110.0314%23 Apr
mirage11–130.0223%23 Apr
ancient13–30.0433%23 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0117%21 Apr
mirage13–80.0230%21 Apr
inferno11–130.0615%19 Apr
mirage2–130.0329%19 Apr
ancient16–120.0414%18 Apr
mirage16–140.0621%18 Apr
inferno3–130.0528%17 Apr
mirage16–140.0642%17 Apr
mirage13–70.0317%14 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0113%14 Apr
mirage15–150.0427%14 Apr
mirage13–110.0517%12 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0120%12 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0114%11 Apr
ancient16–120.0424%11 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0429%9 Apr
mirage13–30.0211%9 Apr
dust213–100.0919%7 Apr
nuke6–130.0433%7 Apr
nuke3–130.0923%5 Apr
inferno16–130.0317%4 Apr
ancient13–50.0516%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0027%4 Apr
dust213–9-0.0016%4 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0221%4 Apr
nuke13–30.0516%3 Apr
ancient10–13-0.037%3 Apr
dust210–13-0.0324%3 Apr
inferno11–130.0511%2 Apr
mirage16–130.0425%2 Apr
anubis13–60.0110%1 Apr
mirage13–60.0610%1 Apr
dust27–130.0324%27 Mar
inferno13–60.0522%26 Mar
dust213–110.0422%26 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0119%26 Mar
mirage16–130.0129%25 Mar
ancient16–130.0422%25 Mar
inferno12–160.0413%25 Mar
ancient6–130.0127%25 Mar
inferno13–80.0522%22 Mar
anubis13–110.0120%22 Mar
mirage3–13-0.097%22 Mar
nuke13–100.0219%22 Mar
dust26–13-0.0142%22 Mar
dust211–130.0625%21 Mar
ancient11–30.1120%21 Mar
overpass7–20.0313%21 Mar
mirage8–130.0316%20 Mar
nuke9–130.0116%20 Mar
dust215–150.0631%20 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0113%20 Mar
dust213–110.0423%14 Mar
ancient14–160.0412%14 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0327%14 Mar
inferno13–70.0825%13 Mar
anubis13–60.0118%13 Mar
ancient13–30.2823%13 Mar
dust213–60.0616%13 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0227%13 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0015%13 Mar
inferno13–90.0217%12 Mar
dust27–130.0226%12 Mar
ancient11–130.0514%12 Mar
inferno13–100.0518%11 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0026%11 Mar
ancient13–110.0118%11 Mar
inferno13–70.0022%11 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →