3245t35 — CS2 Stats

76561197980616402[U:1:20350674]✓ No bans

3,117Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating20,564Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6304 of 15225 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,483 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning66

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim7.5

Aggression10.0

Utility5.8

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels6.4

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 72% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 72% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning6.6

Utility5.8

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels6.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time532ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	37	20–17	54%	0.01
dust2	B	24	11–13	46%	-0.01
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.01
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.00
cache	D	6	1–5	17%	0.01
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,255Matches

49%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

75.0ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	299	54%	0.97	13.9
Dust2	198	54%	0.99	14.8
Ancient	119	46%	0.88	14.2
Inferno	74	51%	0.96	15.3
Nuke	42	45%	0.99	13.9
Anubis	26	42%	1.05	16.0
Overpass	20	50%	0.93	13.7
Cache	18	56%	0.99	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

76.0%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

534msReaction time

38.9%T opening success

72.1%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

10.68HE damage / grenade

8.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.8612% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.06	20%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	19%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	6%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	1%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	16%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.07	5%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	8%	26 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.16	14%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	9%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	32%	26 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	19–17	-0.05	16%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	13%	23 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
cache	16–19	0.01	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	15%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	19%	19 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	13%	18 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	15%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	18%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	15%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	18%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	18%	11 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.05	25%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	11%	11 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	15%	10 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	6%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.11	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	16%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	16%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	22–19	0.01	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.04	17%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	11%	7 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.04	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	15%	7 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	13%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	21%	6 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	31–27	0.04	20%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	12%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.11	10%	4 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	24%	2 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	38%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	20%	1 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	19%	30 Jul →
inferno	22–18	0.07	15%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	21%	29 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	22%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	16%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	9%	29 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.02	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	7%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	11%	28 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	16%	28 Jul →