dewey — CS2 Stats

76561197978638868[U:1:18373140]

2,846Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,712Purple band · top ~13.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12566 of 25701 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeweyPREMIER18,712 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning54
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.4
Utility7.2
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 28anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28151354%0.01
cacheC2491538%0.00
mirageC23101343%0.00
ancientB147750%0.01
anubisD81713%-0.03
inferno3030%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
54%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
72.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2962%0.9814.6
Anubis2662%1.0516.3
Ancient1747%0.9613.4
Inferno1145%0.7010.4
Dust2650%0.9612.0
Overpass10%0.417.0
Vertigo10%1.0424.0
Nuke10%0.7814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
588msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
11.88HE damage / grenade
20.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0218%29 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0320%29 Aug
cache13–70.0421%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0113%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0221%28 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0122%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.0120%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0210%23 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0716%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0121%23 Aug
mirage16–120.0219%23 Aug
dust213–80.0429%21 Aug
cache13–50.1018%21 Aug
cache5–13-0.0535%18 Aug
dust24–13-0.0619%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0016%16 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0710%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0617%16 Aug
dust216–130.0215%15 Aug
mirage13–40.1113%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0213%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0020%12 Aug
dust212–160.0121%11 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0119%10 Aug
mirage13–90.1320%10 Aug
ancient13–90.0518%7 Aug
mirage13–50.0618%6 Aug
cache11–13-0.0114%6 Aug
mirage16–130.0713%3 Aug
cache0–5-0.050%2 Aug
dust27–130.0416%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0412%1 Aug
dust213–40.027%1 Aug
cache6–130.0215%1 Aug
dust27–130.0015%1 Aug
dust213–60.0624%30 Jul
cache5–13-0.0222%30 Jul
mirage10–130.038%29 Jul
dust213–20.0312%29 Jul
cache9–13-0.0416%29 Jul
dust213–90.0521%27 Jul
cache13–16-0.0411%27 Jul
anubis11–130.0414%27 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0119%26 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0522%26 Jul
dust214–160.0219%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0319%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0331%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0418%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0134%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.0721%25 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0627%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0427%25 Jul
dust213–5-0.0611%25 Jul
dust212–160.0419%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0215%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0735%21 Jul
dust216–14-0.058%21 Jul
cache14–160.0322%21 Jul
cache13–70.0412%20 Jul
dust28–130.0231%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0516%18 Jul
dust213–100.0420%17 Jul
cache8–13-0.0626%17 Jul
ancient13–40.0027%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0224%15 Jul
cache6–13-0.0313%15 Jul
cache13–60.1012%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0131%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0224%13 Jul
cache13–10-0.008%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0221%12 Jul
cache13–30.0827%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0541%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0310%11 Jul
dust213–10.0138%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.067%10 Jul
dust28–130.0738%10 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0630%9 Jul
cache13–100.0219%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0610%6 Jul
dust216–130.0018%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%3 Jul
ancient7–130.0030%3 Jul
anubis11–130.0011%3 Jul
cache13–100.0111%3 Jul
dust213–90.0210%3 Jul
ancient13–100.0717%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0511%1 Jul
cache3–13-0.0126%28 Jun
dust212–120.0730%27 Jun
cache1–13-0.0022%27 Jun
dust213–100.0919%26 Jun
cache13–9-0.0123%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0413%25 Jun
dust213–7-0.0031%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0331%25 Jun
mirage14–160.0414%24 Jun
dust213–16-0.0119%23 Jun
mirage10–130.0114%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →