aimedshot5 — CS2 Stats

76561197978441611[U:1:18175883]

1,284Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,765Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,412 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning45

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression4.5

Utility6.0

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch2.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.5

Utility6.0

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time461ms−81ms

first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 461ms

Headshot accuracy15.1%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–8

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 14dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
mirage	C	21	9–12	43%	0.01
inferno	S	14	11–3	79%	0.01
dust2	D	14	3–11	21%	-0.02
cache	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.01
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

431Matches

50%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

83.0ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	41	49%	0.99	15.8
Inferno	32	59%	1.09	15.1
Ancient	24	50%	1.02	17.6
Overpass	14	79%	1.20	19.8
Anubis	11	36%	1.06	15.9
Cache	9	22%	0.92	14.3
Nuke	5	60%	1.27	16.2
Dust2	5	60%	0.96	14.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

74.3%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

467msReaction time

31.1%T opening success

36.0%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

9.66HE damage / grenade

6.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.8066% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.1101% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	0.07	14%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	16%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	16%	25 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	11%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.01	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.11	0%	23 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.05	23%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	10%	22 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	7%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	8%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	8%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	20%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.07	18%	15 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.07	19%	15 Aug →
ancient	5–0	0.01	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	16%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	12%	15 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.07	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	10%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	19%	14 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.05	17%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.01	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	13%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	12%	14 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.01	12%	13 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	41%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	5%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	12%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	20%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	20%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.04	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	10%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	17%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	17%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.12	12%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.00	15%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	6%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.07	34%	3 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	24%	2 Aug →
overpass	2–9	-0.10	17%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	12%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	16%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	29%	2 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	21%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.10	17%	2 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	11%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.00	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.04	14%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	12%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	17%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	12%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	7%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.00	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	14%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	14%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	6%	30 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.08	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.06	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.02	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	17%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	11%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	16%	25 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	11%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.00	10%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	9%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	21%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.12	14%	24 Jul →