bjm

bjm — CS2 Stats

76561197976416054[U:1:16150326]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,579Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,212Pink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7072 of 19305 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,241 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbjmFACEITLevel 10 · 2,241 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,212 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning61
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateWLWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression8.6
Utility5.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time516ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 5–0
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25151060%0.02
mirageC1881044%-0.01
infernoB179853%0.01
nukeB158753%0.01
cacheA138562%0.04
anubisS75271%0.01
dust243175%0.01
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,405Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10256%1.1517.4
Inferno8152%1.0916.3
Nuke8157%1.1417.6
Anubis7455%1.0916.0
Mirage6754%1.1116.4
Dust23543%0.9916.6
Overpass2752%1.1718.5
Vertigo1233%0.9313.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
512msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
65.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
12.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.1016%23 Aug
nuke11–130.0719%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0316%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0418%22 Aug
cache13–60.0435%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0613%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0316%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0327%20 Aug
ancient13–60.0236%20 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0122%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0421%19 Aug
inferno13–80.0615%19 Aug
ancient4–130.0214%17 Aug
cache13–100.0118%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0313%16 Aug
dust213–00.0535%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0331%12 Aug
ancient7–130.0224%12 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0517%11 Aug
cache5–00.1835%11 Aug
anubis13–50.0135%11 Aug
inferno13–70.0315%11 Aug
cache13–70.0213%10 Aug
ancient13–60.0227%10 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0112%9 Aug
cache24–28-0.0123%9 Aug
cache13–60.0921%9 Aug
dust213–5-0.0322%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0219%31 Jul
ancient13–90.0525%31 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0220%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0120%28 Jul
ancient13–00.0134%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0826%24 Jul
cache13–160.0027%24 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0522%24 Jul
cache5–13-0.0417%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0323%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0425%20 Jul
cache2–5-0.0125%19 Jul
inferno4–130.0517%19 Jul
ancient13–40.1218%18 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0233%3 Jul
nuke13–50.0231%3 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0122%6 Jun
ancient13–160.0644%6 Jun
inferno7–130.0127%6 Jun
mirage13–40.0625%6 Jun
inferno7–130.0226%6 Jun
cache13–90.0925%5 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0121%3 Jun
inferno13–70.0431%3 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0216%2 Jun
anubis13–100.0612%2 Jun
anubis13–2-0.039%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0411%1 Jun
dust213–100.0024%30 May
mirage1–13-0.0921%29 May
ancient13–60.0321%29 May
inferno13–10.0428%28 May
cache10–13-0.0111%28 May
ancient8–13-0.0029%28 May
ancient9–13-0.0524%20 May
inferno9–13-0.0622%20 May
mirage10–13-0.0319%18 May
ancient13–100.0019%18 May
inferno13–60.0020%17 May
nuke6–130.0326%17 May
ancient13–8-0.0025%17 May
mirage13–50.0427%16 May
ancient8–130.0411%16 May
inferno12–16-0.0221%16 May
nuke16–130.0725%14 May
overpass16–140.0622%13 May
nuke10–130.0220%13 May
ancient13–50.0418%13 May
nuke16–130.0326%8 May
mirage9–130.0720%8 May
inferno13–40.0216%8 May
mirage13–70.0221%8 May
cache13–80.0217%29 Apr
anubis13–100.0327%27 Apr
ancient9–130.0119%27 Apr
nuke13–110.0227%24 Apr
mirage13–50.0319%24 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0122%24 Apr
inferno13–90.0721%24 Apr
nuke9–130.0422%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0726%24 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0125%24 Apr
dust213–160.0230%24 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0315%23 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0020%23 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0329%20 Apr
inferno11–130.0225%20 Apr
ancient16–130.0619%20 Apr
anubis13–60.0528%19 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0230%19 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0627%18 Apr
ancient13–20.0731%18 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →