Q.3.D

Q.3.D — CS2 Stats

US76561197971330254[U:1:11064526]Steam profile ↗

2,470Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2925 of 18950 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,946 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQ.3.DFACEITLevel 9 · 1,946 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning68
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateWLLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression7.3
Utility7.2
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.8
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time515ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — cache 11–13
132Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC32131941%0.02
infernoB158753%0.04
ancientA148657%0.03
nukeB137654%0.02
dust2D1331023%0.02
overpassC73443%0.05
anubisA53260%0.04
boulder110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

724Matches
55%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
87.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29152%1.1916.9
Ancient7246%1.1817.4
Inferno7063%1.3118.2
Nuke4852%1.1717.5
Cache2864%1.3118.5
Overpass2748%1.1116.7
Anubis1242%1.4621.8
Train771%1.5319.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
529msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
13.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–130.1026%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0615%26 Aug
nuke7–130.0621%25 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0415%25 Aug
overpass13–50.0617%24 Aug
cache11–5-0.0118%24 Aug
cache2–00.000%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0121%24 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0132%24 Aug
dust216–140.0219%24 Aug
dust213–60.0214%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0318%24 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0421%23 Aug
anubis13–90.0221%23 Aug
cache13–70.0119%23 Aug
cache6–130.099%23 Aug
ancient16–140.0914%23 Aug
cache8–130.0418%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0223%23 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0128%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0117%22 Aug
ancient9–30.0717%22 Aug
dust215–150.1120%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0223%21 Aug
dust211–130.0321%21 Aug
ancient13–160.0236%17 Aug
cache11–130.2225%17 Aug
inferno19–170.0616%17 Aug
overpass6–130.0320%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0315%16 Aug
dust211–130.0433%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0114%15 Aug
overpass13–50.0520%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0017%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0815%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0215%15 Aug
nuke13–70.0219%15 Aug
inferno3–00.0725%15 Aug
cache13–5-0.049%15 Aug
ancient8–130.0622%15 Aug
cache0–8-0.070%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.0019%14 Aug
cache5–13-0.046%10 Aug
dust213–110.0113%10 Aug
dust28–130.0122%10 Aug
inferno13–30.0730%10 Aug
cache6–130.0515%10 Aug
dust23–130.0129%10 Aug
cache13–60.0616%8 Aug
cache4–13-0.0118%8 Aug
ancient16–120.0610%8 Aug
anubis13–70.0419%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0925%7 Aug
inferno5–130.0517%6 Aug
boulder13–11-0.0225%6 Aug
cache12–120.0118%6 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0814%6 Aug
dust23–130.0126%6 Aug
overpass13–20.084%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0318%5 Aug
dust211–130.0332%5 Aug
cache13–50.032%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0620%5 Aug
cache13–7-0.0215%5 Aug
anubis13–70.1320%4 Aug
inferno5–130.0422%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0312%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0618%3 Aug
nuke6–130.0911%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0413%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0128%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0622%1 Aug
cache11–13-0.0129%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0323%1 Aug
cache13–100.1319%1 Aug
nuke13–30.1533%1 Aug
overpass10–13-0.017%1 Aug
cache13–40.0120%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0120%1 Aug
inferno13–110.0225%1 Aug
cache12–12-0.0022%30 Jul
overpass7–130.0328%28 Jul
cache12–120.0130%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0225%27 Jul
cache13–60.0413%27 Jul
nuke13–110.0322%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0313%27 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0024%27 Jul
ancient13–160.0316%26 Jul
cache13–80.0225%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0615%26 Jul
cache14–160.0412%26 Jul
nuke11–130.0824%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0216%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0121%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0317%25 Jul
overpass6–130.0725%20 Jul
cache5–13-0.0717%19 Jul
cache12–120.028%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0712%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →