blackfrog

blackfrog — CS2 Stats

76561197970303949[U:1:10038221]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,136Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,779Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9039 of 29585 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,389 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGblackfrogFACEITLevel 9 · 1,389 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,779 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning62
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4654Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression7.3
Utility5.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–2
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 25nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%-0.00
dust2C2181338%-0.02
ancientB178947%-0.01
anubisB157847%0.01
nukeD93633%-0.04
infernoB84450%-0.01
cache42250%-0.02
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,022Matches
61%Win rate
1.78Avg K/D
78.4ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
29Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9851%1.0315.9
Dust28558%1.1116.1
Ancient5547%1.0115.1
Anubis4856%1.2117.7
Inferno4260%1.2215.8
Nuke2737%0.9715.8
Cache1242%0.9613.7
Overpass862%1.4616.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
529msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
6.24HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2977% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–16-0.0631%25 Aug
cache13–5-0.0227%25 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0121%24 Aug
mirage10–130.0120%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0911%24 Aug
dust212–160.0022%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0219%23 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0522%22 Aug
mirage5–130.0336%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0025%21 Aug
anubis20–22-0.0131%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0225%19 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0218%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0725%18 Aug
dust213–80.0514%17 Aug
ancient16–130.0428%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0126%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.0421%15 Aug
cache13–20.0331%12 Aug
anubis13–20.1235%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0621%12 Aug
ancient10–13-0.077%11 Aug
mirage22–190.0024%10 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0217%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0323%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0824%6 Aug
anubis16–130.0319%6 Aug
inferno13–10.0620%30 Apr
dust219–220.0121%30 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0516%29 Apr
mirage10–130.0526%28 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0832%28 Apr
anubis13–160.0025%28 Apr
dust25–13-0.0618%27 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0717%26 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0624%25 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0415%25 Apr
dust213–10.0114%25 Apr
dust27–13-0.0613%25 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0716%25 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0224%25 Apr
inferno13–100.0118%24 Apr
mirage4–13-0.090%24 Apr
anubis13–40.1015%20 Apr
mirage19–17-0.0114%20 Apr
mirage13–100.0217%20 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0715%11 Apr
mirage17–19-0.0113%8 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0418%7 Apr
dust26–13-0.0622%7 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0119%3 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0225%3 Apr
ancient13–110.0020%31 Mar
inferno13–90.0616%31 Mar
dust213–160.0115%28 Mar
dust219–16-0.0114%28 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0117%28 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0130%26 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0518%25 Mar
overpass13–70.0313%24 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0119%24 Mar
nuke8–130.0317%23 Mar
mirage13–50.0524%23 Mar
mirage10–130.0721%22 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0122%22 Mar
mirage9–130.0622%21 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0229%21 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0420%21 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0224%19 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0623%14 Mar
mirage6–13-0.090%14 Mar
dust213–10-0.0115%13 Mar
anubis13–90.0330%13 Mar
ancient13–50.0513%13 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0227%12 Mar
anubis13–30.0912%11 Mar
dust213–16-0.0415%11 Mar
dust25–13-0.0420%11 Mar
anubis13–80.0119%10 Mar
dust24–13-0.0614%10 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0411%8 Mar
inferno16–130.0122%7 Mar
mirage10–130.0123%7 Mar
ancient13–80.0520%6 Mar
dust212–160.0319%6 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0220%6 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0415%6 Mar
dust25–13-0.0128%6 Mar
ancient13–9-0.019%5 Mar
ancient5–130.0216%5 Mar
nuke13–80.0217%5 Mar
dust213–10-0.0541%4 Mar
ancient13–110.0224%4 Mar
mirage13–10.0022%4 Mar
dust213–1-0.0210%4 Mar
mirage11–130.0124%2 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0315%1 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0418%27 Feb
nuke4–13-0.034%26 Feb
dust222–19-0.0222%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →