Gh0sT — CS2 Stats

PL76561197970298726[U:1:10032998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,169Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,902Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19275 of 58486 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning59

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4

Aggression7.0

Utility6.4

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.9

Utility6.4

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time588ms−0ms

first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy15.3%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — poseidon 9–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
anubis	C	17	6–11	35%	0.00
inferno	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
nuke	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
dust2	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
mirage	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

147Matches

52%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

86.0ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	18	50%	1.39	17.3
Ancient	15	67%	1.51	17.9
Nuke	9	56%	1.16	17.1
Inferno	8	38%	1.39	19.4
Cache	8	75%	1.03	14.8
Mirage	6	67%	1.22	12.8
Overpass	6	67%	1.34	14.3
Dust2	5	40%	1.17	17.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.0%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

582msReaction time

27.7%T opening success

54.4%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

9.83HE damage / grenade

8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.69% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	5–13	-0.01	12%	24 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.03	21%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.03	8%	24 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	11%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	15%	21 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	6%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.14	17%	21 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.08	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	27%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	19%	17 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	17%	17 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	20%	10 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.08	8%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	12%	3 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	18%	3 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.09	27%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	16%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	0%	31 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.05	11%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	18%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	17%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	11%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.03	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.01	6%	24 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.00	7%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	31%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	15%	24 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	6%	20 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.05	22%	20 Jul →
cache	12–16	0.01	24%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	20%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	26%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	21%	17 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	18%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	11%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	10%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	5%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	33%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	11%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	25%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	14%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.13	29%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	4%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	19%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.14	33%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	18%	11 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.08	6%	11 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.03	13%	11 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	38%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	10%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	9%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	22%	4 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.03	10%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.07	18%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	25%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	7%	4 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.02	8%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	19%	29 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.02	28%	29 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	17%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–16	0.04	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.05	13%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.04	0%	22 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.02	9%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	18%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	23%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	17%	15 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.05	28%	15 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.02	14%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	15%	15 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	14%	12 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	24%	12 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.10	25%	8 Jun →
overpass	13–3	-0.02	11%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	14%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.02	16%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.07	20%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.06	33%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	12%	6 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.03	20%	1 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	23%	29 May →
inferno	8–13	0.02	18%	28 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	10%	27 May →
inferno	13–11	0.12	17%	26 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	19%	22 May →
dust2	13–3	0.07	21%	22 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	9%	22 May →
nuke	13–6	0.02	11%	22 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	16%	22 May →
nuke	8–8	0.04	12%	22 May →
poseidon	9–1	0.20	33%	22 May →