Dirt bike back flips — CS2 Stats

76561197966687953[U:1:6422225]

956Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,507Purple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11175 of 24585 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDirt bike back flipsFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,507 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning35
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46468Last 10046%Win rateLWLWLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression5.3
Utility6.6
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning3.5
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time585ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — nuke 5–3
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26121446%-0.00
cacheC2191243%0.01
nukeA1710759%0.02
infernoC114736%-0.01
dust2A95456%0.00
ancientB63350%-0.04
overpassC52340%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
47%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass10%0.6513.0
Inferno10%0.314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
589msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
10.06HE damage / grenade
14.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.138% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.1118%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0528%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0716%9 Aug
dust213–110.0012%9 Aug
nuke2–130.0613%9 Aug
mirage6–130.0111%9 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0622%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0619%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0822%9 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0314%9 Aug
cache6–130.0311%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0223%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0015%8 Aug
overpass4–110.0119%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0511%8 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0510%4 Aug
cache13–70.0423%4 Aug
nuke13–70.0322%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.0219%4 Aug
nuke2–130.0417%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0731%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0225%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0225%2 Aug
dust27–130.0714%2 Aug
inferno12–120.0321%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0320%28 Jul
dust26–13-0.0643%19 Jul
cache5–4-0.0133%19 Jul
inferno6–130.0312%19 Jul
cache7–130.0022%19 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0526%19 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0421%18 Jul
nuke10–130.0929%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0325%17 Jul
mirage7–5-0.0115%17 Jul
anubis5–130.0110%17 Jul
inferno5–130.0413%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0520%15 Jul
cache9–130.0411%15 Jul
cache9–130.0325%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0511%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0632%15 Jul
cache15–150.0125%13 Jul
mirage16–140.0120%13 Jul
dust28–130.0421%13 Jul
nuke5–30.0935%13 Jul
cache9–130.0018%13 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0226%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.0323%12 Jul
cache12–120.0123%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0117%12 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0112%12 Jul
overpass12–120.069%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0217%12 Jul
overpass13–70.0611%11 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0315%11 Jul
mirage13–60.058%11 Jul
nuke10–130.0014%11 Jul
dust213–50.0214%11 Jul
mirage6–130.0117%10 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0220%10 Jul
cache13–70.026%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0417%10 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0811%10 Jul
inferno5–130.0416%10 Jul
cache13–20.057%10 Jul
ancient13–1-0.063%10 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0014%10 Jul
nuke13–110.0226%10 Jul
cache14–16-0.0318%10 Jul
mirage11–130.0619%10 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0115%10 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0210%10 Jul
dust213–100.0111%9 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0719%9 Jul
anubis10–130.0235%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0040%9 Jul
nuke13–3-0.008%9 Jul
cache13–90.0419%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0331%6 Jul
inferno13–00.0717%6 Jul
mirage13–30.0411%6 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0614%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0110%5 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0822%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0413%5 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0317%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0017%5 Jul
mirage2–6-0.0367%4 Jul
cache2–130.0631%4 Jul
nuke13–110.0614%4 Jul
overpass0–13-0.0219%4 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0316%3 Jul
dust213–30.0233%3 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0428%3 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0118%3 Jul
nuke8–10.0623%3 Jul
dust213–110.0023%29 Jun
nuke13–90.0427%29 Jun
cache13–80.0315%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →