AL unfckingb — CS2 Stats

76561197965840895[U:1:5575167]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,822Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,743Purple band · top ~25.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#24344 of 41629 tracked

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning55

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.8

Utility3.8

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 732ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning5.5

Utility3.8

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time694ms+32ms

first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 694ms

Headshot accuracy31.0%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 32.4% → last ⅓ avg 31.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

W5Current streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 37

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	37	14–23	38%	0.01
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
cache	A	14	9–5	64%	0.00
dust2	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	0.00
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
office	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
boulder	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches

41%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

72.3ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	100%	1.46	20.5
Dust2	1	0%	1.23	16.0
Cache	1	0%	0.96	24.0
Nuke	1	100%	0.69	11.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.53	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.1%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

732msReaction time

21.6%T opening success

52.0%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

2.0%Flash assists

10.29HE damage / grenade

4.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 731.6108ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.5532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.01	52%	17 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.15	41%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	43%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.12	29%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.00	20%	3 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	58%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	32%	24 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.09	28%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.05	44%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	32%	24 Jul →
office	2–13	-0.02	25%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	20%	22 Jul →
office	8–13	0.04	39%	22 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	18%	22 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	55%	22 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	30%	22 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	0–6	-0.10	0%	21 Jul →
shelter	13–4	0.04	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	10–2	-0.02	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	33%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	28%	20 Jul →
office	5–13	-0.02	41%	20 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.04	48%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	17%	20 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	40%	20 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	27%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.12	23%	19 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	50%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.13	25%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	38%	19 Jul →
nuke	2–5	-0.02	0%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	26%	18 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	42%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	10%	18 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.00	22%	18 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.00	27%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	65%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	38%	17 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	40%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	7%	16 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	-0.08	27%	15 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.09	39%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–1	-0.03	50%	15 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	35%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	46%	14 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	24%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.09	30%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	30%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.13	32%	14 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	20%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.07	27%	13 Jul →
shelter	7–13	0.02	42%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	48%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.08	57%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	22%	12 Jul →
boulder	13–4	-0.03	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	34%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	20%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.19	42%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.16	34%	11 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	30%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	29%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	5%	10 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	19%	10 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	41%	9 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	29%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	29%	9 Jul →
boulder	13–10	0.03	32%	9 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.09	50%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	54%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	35%	8 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	37%	7 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	25%	7 Jul →
dust2	10–0	0.00	35%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.04	20%	7 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	33%	7 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	19%	6 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	40%	6 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	17%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	38%	6 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.11	23%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	36%	6 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.00	33%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	29%	5 Jul →
overpass	9–13	0.02	31%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	28%	5 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.06	64%	5 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.06	25%	5 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	78%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.03	31%	4 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	17%	4 Jul →
overpass	11–2	0.04	50%	4 Jul →